China has aimed far more missiles at Taiwan than previously reported, according to US officials with access to military intelligence. This disclosure comes as China enters a troubling and potentially dangerous time intensified by recent anti-Chinese protests in Tibetan areas.
The officials say China has 1,400 ballistic missiles targeting Taiwan.
That is 40 percent more than earlier reports that gave an approximate figure of 1,000 missiles. The Defense Department, in its recent report on Chinese military power, said 990 to 1,070 missiles were pointed at Taiwan, including variants "with improved ranges, accuracies, and payloads."
The commander of US forces in the Pacific and Asia, Admiral Timothy Keating, told Congress earlier this month: "The threat that China poses is increasing, in my opinion, for the folks who are our friends in Taiwan."
In response to a question from a congressman, he said China's forces are developing capabilities causing "concern as it presents itself as a threat to Taiwan."
While not delving into operational plans to respond to the threat from China, Keating said his Pacific Command was "adequately resourced" to meet US requirements.
He pointed to two aircraft carrier battle groups, six B-52 and three B-2 bombers deployed to Guam in the western Pacific, and a new addition to the Pacific Fleet, the submarine Ohio, which is armed with 150 Tomahawk cruise missiles.
Before the incidents involving Tibetans, a period of relative calm had been expected until the Olympic Games in Beijing in August since China sees that event as proclaiming its arrival as a world political, economic and military power.
After the Olympics would come a time during which China might take advantage of Taiwanese and US preoccupations to move against Taiwan.
The violence in Tibet and consequent international criticism of China's crackdown on human rights may have already opened that window of danger.
Said a longtime China watcher: "It depends on how bloody-minded the Chinese will be."
In the minds of Chinese leaders, Tibet and Taiwan are linked as they are both seen as separatists seeking to escape the rule of Beijing.
To a lesser extent, the same is true of Muslims in the western province of Xinjiang and of ethnic Koreans north of the Yalu River in northeastern China. Any move toward autonomy or independence would be crushed ruthlessly.
Wallace Gregson, a retired Marine lieutenant general and former commander of Marine forces in the Pacific, said in an e-mail message: "The Chinese regime will take whatever action is necessary to stay in power."
After president-elect Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is inaugurated on May 20, it will take him several months to organize his government, giving China a chance to move against Taiwan. Of the basic policies Ma has already set, most will displease the Chinese. While he had promised not to seek independence for Taiwan, he has also ruled out unification with China and demanded no use of military force by either side.
Ma wants China to give Taiwan "international space," meaning not to interfere with Taiwan's efforts to gain diplomatic recognition from other nations and to enter international organizations such as the UN.
"I believe the world is big enough to accommodate both Taiwan and the mainland," he said.
He has proposed a peace agreement with China, which would require Beijing to recognize the government in Taipei as legitimate.
Ma says that he will reform Taiwan's defenses, including rebuilding ties with the US that have been strained under President Chen Shui-bian (
US President George W. Bush, in a message congratulating Ma on his election last Sunday, said: "Once again, Taiwan has demonstrated the strength and vitality of its democracy."
A pillar of US bipartisan foreign policy for decades has been to stand by other democracies.
Bush is a lame duck whose administration is consumed with Iraq and the war on terror, with little attention on China and Taiwan.
That will become more so with the coming US election. After the new president takes office on Jan. 20 next year he or she will need several months to organize an administration.
All told, while Taiwanese and Americans have their attention on internal politics, the Chinese, goaded by Taiwanese and Tibetan resistance, may decide they have an opportunity to strike. That could turn out to be a monumental mistake, a miscalculation that would trigger unpredictable consequences.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Editor's note: Johnny Neihu is on leave.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
RSS