With the TAIEX losing 4.34 percent last week to close at 8,161.39 points, following a 1.41 percent rise the previous week and an 11.86 percent increase last month, uncertainties are once again keeping investors at bay.
But Taiwan is not alone. Regional stock markets took another roller coaster ride last week. In Japan, the Nikkei declined 4.23 percent, while South Korea saw its KOSPI Index fall 3.8 percent, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index dropped 1.18 percent and Singapore's Straits Times Index was down 0.95 percent.
Asian markets remained vulnerable to a spate of negative news ranging from fears of a US recession to ever-rising oil and commodity prices. On top of that, the bailout of US investment bank Bear Stearns by the US Federal Reserve and JPMorgan Chase on Friday was a stark reminder that the turmoil in global financial markets is far from over.
But in Taiwan, investors were particularly watchful last week and should be so this week as well. Ahead of Saturday's presidential election, share prices are likely to remain under pressure and the market could move in a narrow range as a result of political uncertainty.
Market sentiment was dampened by the resignation of minister of finance Ho Chih-chin (
Without a doubt, that episode reminded investors that anything can happen in Taiwanese politics. Some are worried that more confrontations could occur before election day. This could help explain why foreign institutional investors sold a net NT$44.82 billion (US$1.46 billion) of Taiwanese shares last week in stark contrast to a net purchase of NT$12.76 billion the previous week.
Some equity analysts have tried to convince investors that the recent market correction is healthy for medium to long-term development and there is no need to panic. These analysts also forecast the stock market will take off soon after the election -- if there are no surprises -- given the expectations of better cross-strait relations and the continuation of foreign capital inflows.
These analysts have done what they need to do to sell their ideas. But investors need to do their own homework to avoid mistakes amid a volatile market.
First, investors have to realize that political developments have the ability to influence the market. Regardless of who wins the election, it will certainly take time for the new government to make real changes in cross-strait policies. The pace of policy implementation on this front won't come fast. Placing a bet on expectations is one thing, but a realistic bet on market fundamentals is another.
Second, any improvement in a stock market has a lot to do with the performances of the listed companies and the economic fundamentals of the country. Issues such as foreign exchange losses, employee bonus expenses, weak consumer demand in the US, higher inflation and possible changes in monetary policy should be considered more relevant to the performance of Taiwanese shares than other considerations. Surging oil and commodity prices should also raise investors' concerns about rising production costs and margin pressures for Taiwanese manufacturers.
Therefore, investors should not be falling over themselves with expectations based on China's potential alone. There are domestic and international factors that are more relevant, as the past week has shown.
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
The stocks of rare earth companies soared on Monday following news that the Trump administration had taken a 10 percent stake in Oklahoma mining and magnet company USA Rare Earth Inc. Such is the visible benefit enjoyed by the growing number of firms that count Uncle Sam as a shareholder. Yet recent events surrounding perhaps what is the most well-known state-picked champion, Intel Corp, exposed a major unseen cost of the federal government’s unprecedented intervention in private business: the distortion of capital markets that have underpinned US growth and innovation since its founding. Prior to Intel’s Jan. 22 call with analysts
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
International debate on Taiwan is obsessed with “invasion countdowns,” framing the cross-strait crisis as a matter of military timetables and political opportunity. However, the seismic political tremors surrounding Central Military Commission (CMC) vice chairman Zhang Youxia (張又俠) suggested that Washington and Taipei are watching the wrong clock. Beijing is constrained not by a lack of capability, but by an acute fear of regime-threatening military failure. The reported sidelining of Zhang — a combat veteran in a largely unbloodied force and long-time loyalist of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — followed a year of purges within the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA)
RSS