With the TAIEX losing 4.34 percent last week to close at 8,161.39 points, following a 1.41 percent rise the previous week and an 11.86 percent increase last month, uncertainties are once again keeping investors at bay.
But Taiwan is not alone. Regional stock markets took another roller coaster ride last week. In Japan, the Nikkei declined 4.23 percent, while South Korea saw its KOSPI Index fall 3.8 percent, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index dropped 1.18 percent and Singapore's Straits Times Index was down 0.95 percent.
Asian markets remained vulnerable to a spate of negative news ranging from fears of a US recession to ever-rising oil and commodity prices. On top of that, the bailout of US investment bank Bear Stearns by the US Federal Reserve and JPMorgan Chase on Friday was a stark reminder that the turmoil in global financial markets is far from over.
But in Taiwan, investors were particularly watchful last week and should be so this week as well. Ahead of Saturday's presidential election, share prices are likely to remain under pressure and the market could move in a narrow range as a result of political uncertainty.
Market sentiment was dampened by the resignation of minister of finance Ho Chih-chin (
Without a doubt, that episode reminded investors that anything can happen in Taiwanese politics. Some are worried that more confrontations could occur before election day. This could help explain why foreign institutional investors sold a net NT$44.82 billion (US$1.46 billion) of Taiwanese shares last week in stark contrast to a net purchase of NT$12.76 billion the previous week.
Some equity analysts have tried to convince investors that the recent market correction is healthy for medium to long-term development and there is no need to panic. These analysts also forecast the stock market will take off soon after the election -- if there are no surprises -- given the expectations of better cross-strait relations and the continuation of foreign capital inflows.
These analysts have done what they need to do to sell their ideas. But investors need to do their own homework to avoid mistakes amid a volatile market.
First, investors have to realize that political developments have the ability to influence the market. Regardless of who wins the election, it will certainly take time for the new government to make real changes in cross-strait policies. The pace of policy implementation on this front won't come fast. Placing a bet on expectations is one thing, but a realistic bet on market fundamentals is another.
Second, any improvement in a stock market has a lot to do with the performances of the listed companies and the economic fundamentals of the country. Issues such as foreign exchange losses, employee bonus expenses, weak consumer demand in the US, higher inflation and possible changes in monetary policy should be considered more relevant to the performance of Taiwanese shares than other considerations. Surging oil and commodity prices should also raise investors' concerns about rising production costs and margin pressures for Taiwanese manufacturers.
Therefore, investors should not be falling over themselves with expectations based on China's potential alone. There are domestic and international factors that are more relevant, as the past week has shown.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers