With the TAIEX losing 4.34 percent last week to close at 8,161.39 points, following a 1.41 percent rise the previous week and an 11.86 percent increase last month, uncertainties are once again keeping investors at bay.
But Taiwan is not alone. Regional stock markets took another roller coaster ride last week. In Japan, the Nikkei declined 4.23 percent, while South Korea saw its KOSPI Index fall 3.8 percent, Hong Kong's Hang Seng Index dropped 1.18 percent and Singapore's Straits Times Index was down 0.95 percent.
Asian markets remained vulnerable to a spate of negative news ranging from fears of a US recession to ever-rising oil and commodity prices. On top of that, the bailout of US investment bank Bear Stearns by the US Federal Reserve and JPMorgan Chase on Friday was a stark reminder that the turmoil in global financial markets is far from over.
But in Taiwan, investors were particularly watchful last week and should be so this week as well. Ahead of Saturday's presidential election, share prices are likely to remain under pressure and the market could move in a narrow range as a result of political uncertainty.
Market sentiment was dampened by the resignation of minister of finance Ho Chih-chin (
Without a doubt, that episode reminded investors that anything can happen in Taiwanese politics. Some are worried that more confrontations could occur before election day. This could help explain why foreign institutional investors sold a net NT$44.82 billion (US$1.46 billion) of Taiwanese shares last week in stark contrast to a net purchase of NT$12.76 billion the previous week.
Some equity analysts have tried to convince investors that the recent market correction is healthy for medium to long-term development and there is no need to panic. These analysts also forecast the stock market will take off soon after the election -- if there are no surprises -- given the expectations of better cross-strait relations and the continuation of foreign capital inflows.
These analysts have done what they need to do to sell their ideas. But investors need to do their own homework to avoid mistakes amid a volatile market.
First, investors have to realize that political developments have the ability to influence the market. Regardless of who wins the election, it will certainly take time for the new government to make real changes in cross-strait policies. The pace of policy implementation on this front won't come fast. Placing a bet on expectations is one thing, but a realistic bet on market fundamentals is another.
Second, any improvement in a stock market has a lot to do with the performances of the listed companies and the economic fundamentals of the country. Issues such as foreign exchange losses, employee bonus expenses, weak consumer demand in the US, higher inflation and possible changes in monetary policy should be considered more relevant to the performance of Taiwanese shares than other considerations. Surging oil and commodity prices should also raise investors' concerns about rising production costs and margin pressures for Taiwanese manufacturers.
Therefore, investors should not be falling over themselves with expectations based on China's potential alone. There are domestic and international factors that are more relevant, as the past week has shown.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past