The economy and standard of living are both important issues in the presidential election campaign. Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (
The main difference between the two candidates may in fact lie in the manner in which they want to open up toward China. Ma wants a wider opening, while Hsieh stresses that national security must be a consideration and that the opening of cross-strait trade should be more limited, focusing more on global markets. Although both candidates are talking about a prosperous economy, neither of their economic prescriptions may be what Taiwan needs at this stage.
Although the 5.7 percent economic growth Taiwan experienced last year cannot compare with the double digit growth of developing countries, it was a brilliant performance for an economically developed country. Despite this, many Taiwanese still feel life is hard. Why?
The discrepancy between economic data and daily life is the result of deteriorating income distribution -- economic growth has not trickled down from the top earners to the lower income levels, resulting in an M-shaped distribution. High income earners are monopolizing most of the benefits from capital investments and technological innovation, while middle class incomes are not seeing gains, with many people even falling behind and joining the ranks of low income households, feeding a rapid increase in the newly poor.
This income distribution is the result of globalization and competition with China. Salaries are kept down by China's low prices and cheap labor. As Taiwanese demand higher salaries, companies relocate to China, resulting in a virtual salary freeze in Taiwan over the past few years. As soon as local product prices increase, similar but inferior Chinese products are introduced. Meanwhile the Taiwanese public is also suffering from cost increases brought on global increases in oil, grain and raw material prices.
Although both candidates want to promote economic growth, failure to address unequal income distribution might make that problem even worse, causing even more people to feel exploited. In particular, Ma's 633 policy and his all out promotion of economic growth might have an even bigger negative impact on income distribution than Hsieh's economic policy suggestions, especially since Ma's "cross-strait common market" proposal means further deregulating labor, product and capital exchanges. As far as products, prices, salaries and capital movement go -- these changes could add fuel to the fire of negative impact.
Ma's economic thinking seems to be based on the outdated mindset of a developing country. He seems unable to recognize that Taiwan has already entered the low to medium economic growth phase of a developed economy. At this stage, high economic growth will not necessarily have a positive impact on Taiwan's development because problems are no longer of a supply character, but are rather related to income distribution.
More emphasis on social justice and concern for welfare policies for the lower income levels are what this country really needs.
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
When Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) caucus whip Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) first suggested a mass recall of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators, the Taipei Times called the idea “not only absurd, but also deeply undemocratic” (“Lai’s speech and legislative chaos,” Jan. 6, page 8). In a subsequent editorial (“Recall chaos plays into KMT hands,” Jan. 9, page 8), the paper wrote that his suggestion was not a solution, and that if it failed, it would exacerbate the enmity between the parties and lead to a cascade of revenge recalls. The danger came from having the DPP orchestrate a mass recall. As it transpired,
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
RSS