For cyclists in Taipei, two things changed this weekend. On Saturday, the Taipei MRT system opened 12 more stations to cyclists and their bikes, bringing the number of stations with bicycle access up to 27 of the 69 stops. Then, on Sunday, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications (MOTC) announced new traffic rules for cyclists on city streets that will take effect at the end of this month.
The city's growing population of cyclists will no doubt welcome the chance to board the MRT with their bikes at more stations. Cycling has seen an explosion in popularity in recent years and this enthusiasm is as apparent in the heart of the nation's congested capital as anywhere.
On weekends, bike paths along the city's riverside parks draw cyclists of all ages. There is no doubt that the city has responded well to increasing interest, and its expanding network of bike paths has proved a popular investment.
Unfortunately, Taipei's bicycle infrastructure seems to revolve around one word: recreation.
Taipei's interest in cycling has a lot of potential. The nation's greenhouse gas emissions are climbing at a disturbing rate. At the same time, higher oil prices have brought down fuel sales as more people opt to leave their motor vehicles at home. Gasoline sales dropped 7.9 percent in January compared with last year, while passenger traffic on Taipei's MRT rose 7.4 percent. Reducing dependence on oil supplies and cutting the number of cars on Taipei's crowded streets is good news for a country that is having a difficult time cleaning up its act.
But in this context, biking -- a cheap and clean mode of transport -- remains a highly unattractive alternative for getting around the city, and officials have done little to coax cyclists out of the parks.
The MRT system remains closed to cyclists on weekdays and none of the major streets has bike lanes. Those taking Taiwan Railway Administration (TRA) trains into the city cannot bring bikes at all -- unless they are taken apart or folded. And while the administration will allow passengers to carry bicycles onto the trains for a trial run on Saturday, details of the scheme suggest that the TRA is hoping to tap into the popularity of recreational cycling, rather than promoting bicycles as an alternative mode of transport.
Measures that treat biking as a mode of transport are few and far between. But the MOTC's new regulations are at least an indication that officials are giving some thought to the matter.
The regulations will require bikes sharing the road with motor vehicles to follow traffic signs and lights. In addition, the ministry said bicycle crossings would be added at intersections -- as bikes may not use crosswalks -- and cyclists would be allowed to park their bikes in spots previously reserved for scooters.
But if biking is to gain ground as a common way of getting around -- as it has in many northern European cities -- officials will have to do more than offer the occasional piecemeal change in policy. The city needs a clear map to harness a well-timed trend and wean more residents off gas-guzzling vehicles.
Taipei's officials should be assessing the obstacles to this and promoting bikes as a viable option. The MRT system will expand considerably in the next few years, hopefully further reducing congestion in the streets.
With the right infrastructure for cyclists and increased access to the MRT, getting around town with nothing more than a bike and an EasyCard could become a practical alternative for many commuters.
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS