It's tough to imagine Senator Hillary Clinton giving up her conservative pantsuits and perfect hair for a cowboy hat and holsters on each hip. And so far she hasn't.
But like a gunslinger out of the US' mythical past, Texas is where she is making her stand.
Clinton's campaign is in trouble. Senator Barack Obama has beaten her in 11 consecutive primaries and is ahead in votes, opinion polls and money.
Today, voters will decide in Texas, Ohio, Vermont and Rhode Island.
Even former US president Bill Clinton has publicly acknowledged that "If she wins Texas and Ohio I think she will be the nominee. If [they] don't deliver for her, I don't think she can be."
Texas is the state to watch, though, because it awards more delegates than any other state still in play and, because, it's Texas -- a place with the perfect poetry for a one-on-one do-or-die contest between two determined rivals. Have you ever heard of a shoot-out in Ohio?
Clinton knows Texas. Back in 1972, when she was still in law school, she volunteered to recruit voters along the Rio Grande.
Even she concedes that "Hispanics in South Texas were, understandably, wary of a blond girl from Chicago who didn't speak a word of Spanish."
But she persevered. She made friends in Texas politics and cultivated them while husband Bill was governor of neighboring Arkansas and then president.
Obama hasn't got that history, but he has excitement. And Texas has strange rules: excitement is an asset.
Bill Clinton jokes that "Texas is the only place in America where you can vote twice in the same election without going to jail."
He's right -- Texans can cast a ballot in a voting booth and then vote again at a caucus meeting.
Who would care enough to turn out twice? People who care passionately about their candidate: Obama supporters.
A few months ago, Hillary Clinton had a clear lead in the public opinion polls conducted in Texas.
Now it's a statistical dead heat.
The outcome today could either restore her campaign, or end it entirely.
Texas may be "no country for old men." But it's crucial country for Clinton.
Jonathan Mann is a CNN anchor and correspondent.
Taiwan might just give up. That’s the argument Simon Shuster made in The Atlantic’s October issue. The US is unreliable, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership is aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Taiwan does not have the military capability to defend itself in a prolonged war without help. What hope does Taiwan have? Quite a bit more, in fact, than Shuster lets on. Shuster points to genuine problems. The first Donald Trump administration had a mostly positive record on Taiwan policy. It regularized the arms sales process, enhanced the military-to-military relationship, and treated Taiwan more like a normal
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Last year, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) turned the Double Ten National Day ceremony into a platform for grievances against the government. Yesterday, standing before the president and foreign dignitaries, he warned against Taiwan becoming a “false democracy, in reality a dictatorship.” Then he called for unity. Democratic leaders must tolerate criticism, even on ceremonial occasions, but Han misused his position and a national celebration to insinuate that Taiwan’s elected president was steering the country toward dictatorship and cast himself as a statesman offering reconciliation. Han asked how Taiwan’s security should be examined, using a medical analogy. If he insists on playing
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving
RSS