"I have tried to keep the memory alive. I have tried to fight those who would forget. Because if we forget, we are guilty ... not to remember would turn us into accomplices of the killers, to remember would turn anyone into a friend of the victims."
So said Elie Wiesel, Holocaust survivor and renowned author, in his 1986 Nobel Peace Prize acceptance speech.
Yesterday marked the 61st anniversary of the 228 Incident, and to this day some of the victims' families still do not know why their loved ones were killed or where their remains lie.
Tens of thousands of society's elite -- ethnic Taiwanese and Mainlander alike -- were arrested, tortured and murdered during the brutal military crackdown that began in late February 1947. The Incident began a tragic page in Taiwan's history and ushered in the White Terror era.
Sadly, the commemoration of this catastrophic event has seemingly become a formality. Politicians visit the families of victims, hold memorial services, give speeches and all the rest of it, but what most of them will not tell their listeners is that increasing numbers of people -- and especially the younger generations -- are doing exactly what Wiesel so eloquently warned against: forgetting.
Talk to young people today and many, if not most, would be unable to offer even a brief account of what took place 61 years ago.
Some may dismiss this as inevitable, but this need not be the case -- if the government and people of high standing care enough about their history and its unjust legacy.
Schools in many Western nations include The Diary of Anne Frank in school curriculums. Other than a comic book treatment of Taiwanese history that was released some years ago, there is no material in local school curriculums that performs the corresponding function of educating young people about the 228 Incident and humanizing its victims.
Young Taiwanese may shed the odd tear while watching Schindler's List, yet how many would feel a sense of connection when stories of the 228 Incident are told at commemorative services?
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
This is a welcome suggestion, but a fairly token one in the context of the ongoing lack of accountability of the KMT in relation to its stolen assets, ideological scars and autocratic residue -- the survival of which owes everything to the 228 Incident and what followed.
If Ma felt for the 228 Incident's victims and the agony suffered by their families, then he would have castigated his party for once again blocking a budget in the legislature that would have provided more support for the victims and their families.
We hear a lot from self-congratulatory Taiwanese about our democracy. But the meaning of "Taiwanese democracy" and its citizens' ability to defend it are tempered by the reality that more and more Taiwanese know nothing about -- and sometimes cruelly rationalize -- this nation's dirty history.
The last thing any person of conscience would hope to see is 228 Memorial Day following in the footsteps of other holidays, in which people vaguely do the "right thing" out of sheer habit and lack understanding of what the day represents.
As ordinary Taiwanese increasingly seek to depoliticize their lives, and as politicians turn the crimes of their fathers into their own political capital, this may turn out to be little more than a pipe dream.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor
RSS