The Taipei Times has not given prominent coverage on the developments in Kosovo that led to the proclamation of a new European state on Sunday. The international community has, however, paid close attention for years as it is connected with some of the most important issues facing the world today.
For example: Can foreign countries recognize Kosovo in view of UN Declaration 1244, which does not map out independence as an option? Is the moral right for independence based on the wish of a not ethnically homogeneous nation or on the brutal repression by the former Serbian government of Slobodan Milosevic?
Will the EU mission be handicapped by the lack of a new UN resolution? Will the EU's determination be hindered by the significant resistance of countries harboring breakaway movements within their borders? Is the contamination effect of Kosovo really so strong that Russia finds it necessary to actively support the radical movement in Serbia?
Does the Serbian government truly reflect the long term wishes of its people in taking the issue to each and every international forum?
Let's also take a look at the difficult next steps that some of the actors need to reflect on.
Can the international community work out a concept of limited sovereignty tailor-made to solve Kosovo's situation?
Will Kosovo's move be followed by Republika Srpska in Bosnia and will Montenegro recognize Kosovo?
The Republic of Kosovo is a child born under complicated circumstances. Certainly it is of concern to everyone interested in these key issues of national identity. I wish Taipei Times readers could be better briefed about all the complicated but interesting aspects of this unique development.
Bengt Johansson
Sweden
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS