A fresh assessment of the future of energy in Asia asserts that the region, along with the US, is being confronted with a "daunting challenge" as oil consumption is rising much faster than production and the end of the world's oil supply is in sight.
Asia's Energy Future, a book published by the East-West Center, a research and educational institute in Honolulu, says "the challenge of energy security is greater than ever. The days of cheap and plentiful oil are over. World oil production is likely to reach a peak some time in the next 10 to 15 years" before leveling off and declining.
The principal authors, Fereidun Fesharaki and Kang Wu, authorities on energy, wrote: "Coupled with emerging supply limitations, the Asia-Pacific region's increasing demand for oil raises fears of tensions among Asian nations and between Asia and the West."
Frederick Smith, the chief executive officer of FedEx, the world's largest express-transport company with 700 airplanes and 80,000 trucks that consume prodigious amounts of jet fuel and gasoline, was more pointed.
Writing in Newsweek, Smith said: "It shouldn't be forgotten that the proximate cause of World War II was the US oil embargo against Japan."
"The first Gulf War was caused totally by oil -- it was Saddam Hussein's insistence that he owned certain oil fields that led to his invasion of Kuwait and our ouster of his forces there," he wrote
What he calls "the subsequent presence" of the US in the Middle East -- evidently meaning Iraq -- has been driven by oil. Smith says some analysts think 40 percent of US military spending "can be attributed to protecting the oil trade." Indeed, the competition for energy in Asia, even more than the confrontations between North and South Korea, China and Taiwan, and India and Pakistan, could be the cause of hostilities across the entire region, with unpredictable consequences.
Fesharaki and Wu's book points to the obvious cause of the increased consumption of oil: economic growth.
"Since 1900," Fesharaki said in an overview, "well over one-half of the annual growth in global oil consumption has originated from Asia and the Pacific."
In one year, 2004, "China alone accounted for nearly one-third of the growth in oil consumption in the entire world." India was not far behind, the book says, "and this pattern is projected to continue." The demand is "driven primarily by the growing number of motor vehicles." Heavy industry is partly responsible in China, less so in India because it emphasizes information technology.
A complicating factor: Half of China's oil imports come from the Middle East while India is even more dependent on Middle Eastern sources. That is not likely to change and it gives Beijing and New Delhi reason to dip into the power politics of the already volatile region.
Both nations, the book says, are experiencing "a renewed emphasis on hydropower and nuclear energy."
Hydropower in China accounted for three percent of its energy in 1980 and is expected to rise to 8 percent by 2015. The famed -- and controversial -- Three Gorges hydroelectric plant is scheduled to be completed next year at an enormous cost in funds, displaced people and submerged cultural treasures.
China appears to have lagged in nuclear energy, which produced only 1 percent of the nation's needs in 1993. Beijing plans to build enough nuclear plants to meet four percent of demand by 2020.
In India, hydroelectric capacity provided 26 percent of installed power capacity in 2005, but has been growing at a rate slower than demand. Nuclear power then accounted for only 3 percent of electrical generation, but that is expected to double this year.
To counter these trends in oil production and consumption, the East-West Center researchers say, "business as usual is not an option." They recommend policies to reduce price volatility, such as building strategic oil reserves. They advocate policies to bring a better balance between supply and demand, such as reducing bottlenecks in transport.
The authors call on political leaders in the US, the world's largest consumer of energy, and the Asia-Pacific region, the fastest growing consumer of energy, "to make bold and profound changes."
"Half measures are not enough, and they may even make the situation worse," they say.
They say that "high oil prices, although painful for consumers, may provide a needed incentive."
But they close, with academic understatement, on a less than confident note: "Heightened competition in international oil markets may work against cooperative efforts."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with