A fresh assessment of the future of energy in Asia asserts that the region, along with the US, is being confronted with a "daunting challenge" as oil consumption is rising much faster than production and the end of the world's oil supply is in sight.
Asia's Energy Future, a book published by the East-West Center, a research and educational institute in Honolulu, says "the challenge of energy security is greater than ever. The days of cheap and plentiful oil are over. World oil production is likely to reach a peak some time in the next 10 to 15 years" before leveling off and declining.
The principal authors, Fereidun Fesharaki and Kang Wu, authorities on energy, wrote: "Coupled with emerging supply limitations, the Asia-Pacific region's increasing demand for oil raises fears of tensions among Asian nations and between Asia and the West."
Frederick Smith, the chief executive officer of FedEx, the world's largest express-transport company with 700 airplanes and 80,000 trucks that consume prodigious amounts of jet fuel and gasoline, was more pointed.
Writing in Newsweek, Smith said: "It shouldn't be forgotten that the proximate cause of World War II was the US oil embargo against Japan."
"The first Gulf War was caused totally by oil -- it was Saddam Hussein's insistence that he owned certain oil fields that led to his invasion of Kuwait and our ouster of his forces there," he wrote
What he calls "the subsequent presence" of the US in the Middle East -- evidently meaning Iraq -- has been driven by oil. Smith says some analysts think 40 percent of US military spending "can be attributed to protecting the oil trade." Indeed, the competition for energy in Asia, even more than the confrontations between North and South Korea, China and Taiwan, and India and Pakistan, could be the cause of hostilities across the entire region, with unpredictable consequences.
Fesharaki and Wu's book points to the obvious cause of the increased consumption of oil: economic growth.
"Since 1900," Fesharaki said in an overview, "well over one-half of the annual growth in global oil consumption has originated from Asia and the Pacific."
In one year, 2004, "China alone accounted for nearly one-third of the growth in oil consumption in the entire world." India was not far behind, the book says, "and this pattern is projected to continue." The demand is "driven primarily by the growing number of motor vehicles." Heavy industry is partly responsible in China, less so in India because it emphasizes information technology.
A complicating factor: Half of China's oil imports come from the Middle East while India is even more dependent on Middle Eastern sources. That is not likely to change and it gives Beijing and New Delhi reason to dip into the power politics of the already volatile region.
Both nations, the book says, are experiencing "a renewed emphasis on hydropower and nuclear energy."
Hydropower in China accounted for three percent of its energy in 1980 and is expected to rise to 8 percent by 2015. The famed -- and controversial -- Three Gorges hydroelectric plant is scheduled to be completed next year at an enormous cost in funds, displaced people and submerged cultural treasures.
China appears to have lagged in nuclear energy, which produced only 1 percent of the nation's needs in 1993. Beijing plans to build enough nuclear plants to meet four percent of demand by 2020.
In India, hydroelectric capacity provided 26 percent of installed power capacity in 2005, but has been growing at a rate slower than demand. Nuclear power then accounted for only 3 percent of electrical generation, but that is expected to double this year.
To counter these trends in oil production and consumption, the East-West Center researchers say, "business as usual is not an option." They recommend policies to reduce price volatility, such as building strategic oil reserves. They advocate policies to bring a better balance between supply and demand, such as reducing bottlenecks in transport.
The authors call on political leaders in the US, the world's largest consumer of energy, and the Asia-Pacific region, the fastest growing consumer of energy, "to make bold and profound changes."
"Half measures are not enough, and they may even make the situation worse," they say.
They say that "high oil prices, although painful for consumers, may provide a needed incentive."
But they close, with academic understatement, on a less than confident note: "Heightened competition in international oil markets may work against cooperative efforts."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
A failure by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to respond to Israel’s brilliant 12-day (June 12-23) bombing and special operations war against Iran, topped by US President Donald Trump’s ordering the June 21 bombing of Iranian deep underground nuclear weapons fuel processing sites, has been noted by some as demonstrating a profound lack of resolve, even “impotence,” by China. However, this would be a dangerous underestimation of CCP ambitions and its broader and more profound military response to the Trump Administration — a challenge that includes an acceleration of its strategies to assist nuclear proxy states, and developing a wide array
Jaw Shaw-kong (趙少康), former chairman of Broadcasting Corp of China and leader of the “blue fighters,” recently announced that he had canned his trip to east Africa, and he would stay in Taiwan for the recall vote on Saturday. He added that he hoped “his friends in the blue camp would follow his lead.” His statement is quite interesting for a few reasons. Jaw had been criticized following media reports that he would be traveling in east Africa during the recall vote. While he decided to stay in Taiwan after drawing a lot of flak, his hesitation says it all: If
Twenty-four Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers are facing recall votes on Saturday, prompting nearly all KMT officials and lawmakers to rally their supporters over the past weekend, urging them to vote “no” in a bid to retain their seats and preserve the KMT’s majority in the Legislative Yuan. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which had largely kept its distance from the civic recall campaigns, earlier this month instructed its officials and staff to support the recall groups in a final push to protect the nation. The justification for the recalls has increasingly been framed as a “resistance” movement against China and
Owing to the combined majority of the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), the legislature last week voted to further extend the current session to the end of next month, prolonging the session twice for a total of 211 days, the longest in Taiwan’s democratic history. Legally, the legislature holds two regular sessions annually: from February to May, and from September to December. The extensions pushed by the opposition in May and last week mean there would be no break between the first and second sessions this year. While the opposition parties said the extensions were needed to
RSS