A fresh assessment of the future of energy in Asia asserts that the region, along with the US, is being confronted with a "daunting challenge" as oil consumption is rising much faster than production and the end of the world's oil supply is in sight.
Asia's Energy Future, a book published by the East-West Center, a research and educational institute in Honolulu, says "the challenge of energy security is greater than ever. The days of cheap and plentiful oil are over. World oil production is likely to reach a peak some time in the next 10 to 15 years" before leveling off and declining.
The principal authors, Fereidun Fesharaki and Kang Wu, authorities on energy, wrote: "Coupled with emerging supply limitations, the Asia-Pacific region's increasing demand for oil raises fears of tensions among Asian nations and between Asia and the West."
Frederick Smith, the chief executive officer of FedEx, the world's largest express-transport company with 700 airplanes and 80,000 trucks that consume prodigious amounts of jet fuel and gasoline, was more pointed.
Writing in Newsweek, Smith said: "It shouldn't be forgotten that the proximate cause of World War II was the US oil embargo against Japan."
"The first Gulf War was caused totally by oil -- it was Saddam Hussein's insistence that he owned certain oil fields that led to his invasion of Kuwait and our ouster of his forces there," he wrote
What he calls "the subsequent presence" of the US in the Middle East -- evidently meaning Iraq -- has been driven by oil. Smith says some analysts think 40 percent of US military spending "can be attributed to protecting the oil trade." Indeed, the competition for energy in Asia, even more than the confrontations between North and South Korea, China and Taiwan, and India and Pakistan, could be the cause of hostilities across the entire region, with unpredictable consequences.
Fesharaki and Wu's book points to the obvious cause of the increased consumption of oil: economic growth.
"Since 1900," Fesharaki said in an overview, "well over one-half of the annual growth in global oil consumption has originated from Asia and the Pacific."
In one year, 2004, "China alone accounted for nearly one-third of the growth in oil consumption in the entire world." India was not far behind, the book says, "and this pattern is projected to continue." The demand is "driven primarily by the growing number of motor vehicles." Heavy industry is partly responsible in China, less so in India because it emphasizes information technology.
A complicating factor: Half of China's oil imports come from the Middle East while India is even more dependent on Middle Eastern sources. That is not likely to change and it gives Beijing and New Delhi reason to dip into the power politics of the already volatile region.
Both nations, the book says, are experiencing "a renewed emphasis on hydropower and nuclear energy."
Hydropower in China accounted for three percent of its energy in 1980 and is expected to rise to 8 percent by 2015. The famed -- and controversial -- Three Gorges hydroelectric plant is scheduled to be completed next year at an enormous cost in funds, displaced people and submerged cultural treasures.
China appears to have lagged in nuclear energy, which produced only 1 percent of the nation's needs in 1993. Beijing plans to build enough nuclear plants to meet four percent of demand by 2020.
In India, hydroelectric capacity provided 26 percent of installed power capacity in 2005, but has been growing at a rate slower than demand. Nuclear power then accounted for only 3 percent of electrical generation, but that is expected to double this year.
To counter these trends in oil production and consumption, the East-West Center researchers say, "business as usual is not an option." They recommend policies to reduce price volatility, such as building strategic oil reserves. They advocate policies to bring a better balance between supply and demand, such as reducing bottlenecks in transport.
The authors call on political leaders in the US, the world's largest consumer of energy, and the Asia-Pacific region, the fastest growing consumer of energy, "to make bold and profound changes."
"Half measures are not enough, and they may even make the situation worse," they say.
They say that "high oil prices, although painful for consumers, may provide a needed incentive."
But they close, with academic understatement, on a less than confident note: "Heightened competition in international oil markets may work against cooperative efforts."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
When 17,000 troops from the US, the Philippines, Australia, Japan, Canada, France and New Zealand spread across the Philippine archipelago for the Balikatan military exercise, running from tomorrow through May 8, the official language would be about interoperability, readiness and regional peace. However, the strategic subtext is becoming harder to ignore: The exercises are increasingly about the military geography around Taiwan. Balikatan has always carried political weight. This year, however, the exercise looks different in ways that matter not only to Manila and Washington, but also to Taipei. What began in 2023 as a shift toward a more serious deterrence posture
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
China’s AI ecosystem has one defining difference from Silicon Valley: It is embrace of open source. While the US’ biggest companies race to build ever more powerful systems and insist only they can control them, Chinese labs have been giving the technology away for free. Open source — making a model available for anyone to use, download and build on — once seemed a niche, nerdy topic that no one besides developers cared about. However, when a new technology is driving trillions of dollars of investments and leading to immense concentrations of power, it offered an antidote. That is part of
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be