A fresh assessment of the future of energy in Asia asserts that the region, along with the US, is being confronted with a "daunting challenge" as oil consumption is rising much faster than production and the end of the world's oil supply is in sight.
Asia's Energy Future, a book published by the East-West Center, a research and educational institute in Honolulu, says "the challenge of energy security is greater than ever. The days of cheap and plentiful oil are over. World oil production is likely to reach a peak some time in the next 10 to 15 years" before leveling off and declining.
The principal authors, Fereidun Fesharaki and Kang Wu, authorities on energy, wrote: "Coupled with emerging supply limitations, the Asia-Pacific region's increasing demand for oil raises fears of tensions among Asian nations and between Asia and the West."
Frederick Smith, the chief executive officer of FedEx, the world's largest express-transport company with 700 airplanes and 80,000 trucks that consume prodigious amounts of jet fuel and gasoline, was more pointed.
Writing in Newsweek, Smith said: "It shouldn't be forgotten that the proximate cause of World War II was the US oil embargo against Japan."
"The first Gulf War was caused totally by oil -- it was Saddam Hussein's insistence that he owned certain oil fields that led to his invasion of Kuwait and our ouster of his forces there," he wrote
What he calls "the subsequent presence" of the US in the Middle East -- evidently meaning Iraq -- has been driven by oil. Smith says some analysts think 40 percent of US military spending "can be attributed to protecting the oil trade." Indeed, the competition for energy in Asia, even more than the confrontations between North and South Korea, China and Taiwan, and India and Pakistan, could be the cause of hostilities across the entire region, with unpredictable consequences.
Fesharaki and Wu's book points to the obvious cause of the increased consumption of oil: economic growth.
"Since 1900," Fesharaki said in an overview, "well over one-half of the annual growth in global oil consumption has originated from Asia and the Pacific."
In one year, 2004, "China alone accounted for nearly one-third of the growth in oil consumption in the entire world." India was not far behind, the book says, "and this pattern is projected to continue." The demand is "driven primarily by the growing number of motor vehicles." Heavy industry is partly responsible in China, less so in India because it emphasizes information technology.
A complicating factor: Half of China's oil imports come from the Middle East while India is even more dependent on Middle Eastern sources. That is not likely to change and it gives Beijing and New Delhi reason to dip into the power politics of the already volatile region.
Both nations, the book says, are experiencing "a renewed emphasis on hydropower and nuclear energy."
Hydropower in China accounted for three percent of its energy in 1980 and is expected to rise to 8 percent by 2015. The famed -- and controversial -- Three Gorges hydroelectric plant is scheduled to be completed next year at an enormous cost in funds, displaced people and submerged cultural treasures.
China appears to have lagged in nuclear energy, which produced only 1 percent of the nation's needs in 1993. Beijing plans to build enough nuclear plants to meet four percent of demand by 2020.
In India, hydroelectric capacity provided 26 percent of installed power capacity in 2005, but has been growing at a rate slower than demand. Nuclear power then accounted for only 3 percent of electrical generation, but that is expected to double this year.
To counter these trends in oil production and consumption, the East-West Center researchers say, "business as usual is not an option." They recommend policies to reduce price volatility, such as building strategic oil reserves. They advocate policies to bring a better balance between supply and demand, such as reducing bottlenecks in transport.
The authors call on political leaders in the US, the world's largest consumer of energy, and the Asia-Pacific region, the fastest growing consumer of energy, "to make bold and profound changes."
"Half measures are not enough, and they may even make the situation worse," they say.
They say that "high oil prices, although painful for consumers, may provide a needed incentive."
But they close, with academic understatement, on a less than confident note: "Heightened competition in international oil markets may work against cooperative efforts."
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS