The unusually harsh winter weather in parts of China has put a great deal of economic activity on hold over the past three weeks, but the worst may be yet to come.
As south and central China see the heaviest blizzards in half a century, the scale of their effect has caught the Chinese authorities off guard and raised many issues not only for Beijing, but also the many economies with close ties with China.
China's Ministry of Civil Affairs said that the snowstorms have caused at least 53.79 billion yuan (US$7.5 billion) in direct economic losses as of Thursday. The losses are expected to keep growing, as meteorologists forecast another cold front in the next few days.
To ease public concern, Beijing created a 5 billion yuan emergency fund for farmers last week, while asking its commercial banks to extend more credit to businesses in disaster areas.
On Saturday, the Chinese government released emergency food supplies onto the market to stem inflation, which has already reached the highest levels in a decade in the past few months.
The snowstorms have demonstrated the inadequacies of China's infrastructure. It would be foolish to think that other countries are protected from the effects of China's troubles.
The scenes of hundreds of thousands of migrant workers stranded at bus and train stations ahead of the Lunar New Year illustrated the country's demographic problems. The snowstorms made the urban-rural gap as visible as ever, but will Beijing act to narrow the divide?
Adjusting China's two-track development to close the gap would no doubt mean allowing many of these migrant workers to settle as legal urban residents. That would have the advantage of easing the burden on the country's transportation system, but a change like this would also require a sharp escalation in welfare expenditures.
Poverty, inequality and unemployment remain major, almost intractable problems despite double-digit economic growth the last five years.
The snowstorms have made the economic implications of China's under-development clear. Its poor infrastructure could easily shake the world economy. In the global village the world economy has become, China is a giant factory -- with terribly unreliable roads leading to and from it.
Businesses have suffered power cuts as closed harbors and jammed railroads mean delayed coal shipments, while the cold weather has eaten rapidly into coal stockpiles.
If the storms continue and transport remains blocked after the weeklong holiday, blocked production will mean serious losses for many companies and slowed exports. Meanwhile, food supplies and raw materials will also be held back by ice-covered roads and rails. The result? China's already aggravated inflation will get an unwelcome boost.
In the worst-case scenario, China will be facing a slowing economy and rising inflation -- a double-edged sword. If Beijing reacts to rising inflation by tightening monetary policies, it will discourage companies from borrowing money from banks to expand or invest in real estate.
In the context of a global economy strained by the US subprime fallout and whispers of a US recession, it is unclear how markets would stand a slowdown in the Chinese economy. And if the situation continues to deteriorate in the US, it is not clear how Chinese policymakers will react should that cut into exports.
The situation is delicate and the effects of China's poor infrastructure in combination with a cruel winter could multiply. With its many business across the Taiwan Strait, Taiwan's government has every reason to keep a close watch.
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS