The unusually harsh winter weather in parts of China has put a great deal of economic activity on hold over the past three weeks, but the worst may be yet to come.
As south and central China see the heaviest blizzards in half a century, the scale of their effect has caught the Chinese authorities off guard and raised many issues not only for Beijing, but also the many economies with close ties with China.
China's Ministry of Civil Affairs said that the snowstorms have caused at least 53.79 billion yuan (US$7.5 billion) in direct economic losses as of Thursday. The losses are expected to keep growing, as meteorologists forecast another cold front in the next few days.
To ease public concern, Beijing created a 5 billion yuan emergency fund for farmers last week, while asking its commercial banks to extend more credit to businesses in disaster areas.
On Saturday, the Chinese government released emergency food supplies onto the market to stem inflation, which has already reached the highest levels in a decade in the past few months.
The snowstorms have demonstrated the inadequacies of China's infrastructure. It would be foolish to think that other countries are protected from the effects of China's troubles.
The scenes of hundreds of thousands of migrant workers stranded at bus and train stations ahead of the Lunar New Year illustrated the country's demographic problems. The snowstorms made the urban-rural gap as visible as ever, but will Beijing act to narrow the divide?
Adjusting China's two-track development to close the gap would no doubt mean allowing many of these migrant workers to settle as legal urban residents. That would have the advantage of easing the burden on the country's transportation system, but a change like this would also require a sharp escalation in welfare expenditures.
Poverty, inequality and unemployment remain major, almost intractable problems despite double-digit economic growth the last five years.
The snowstorms have made the economic implications of China's under-development clear. Its poor infrastructure could easily shake the world economy. In the global village the world economy has become, China is a giant factory -- with terribly unreliable roads leading to and from it.
Businesses have suffered power cuts as closed harbors and jammed railroads mean delayed coal shipments, while the cold weather has eaten rapidly into coal stockpiles.
If the storms continue and transport remains blocked after the weeklong holiday, blocked production will mean serious losses for many companies and slowed exports. Meanwhile, food supplies and raw materials will also be held back by ice-covered roads and rails. The result? China's already aggravated inflation will get an unwelcome boost.
In the worst-case scenario, China will be facing a slowing economy and rising inflation -- a double-edged sword. If Beijing reacts to rising inflation by tightening monetary policies, it will discourage companies from borrowing money from banks to expand or invest in real estate.
In the context of a global economy strained by the US subprime fallout and whispers of a US recession, it is unclear how markets would stand a slowdown in the Chinese economy. And if the situation continues to deteriorate in the US, it is not clear how Chinese policymakers will react should that cut into exports.
The situation is delicate and the effects of China's poor infrastructure in combination with a cruel winter could multiply. With its many business across the Taiwan Strait, Taiwan's government has every reason to keep a close watch.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS