The 'Times,' it ain't changin'
Dear Johnny,
Yes, I read something objectionable about Taiwan.
The front page headline on the New York Times the day after the legislative elections was "China win in Taiwan election," directing the reader to an article further back.
I wrote the Times immediately explaining that the election hadn't been fought on unification (why do they keep using "re"unification, with its implication that Taiwan was once part of the People's Republic of China?), that the KMT hasn't promised to put the island under Beijing's control, etc.
And I named a few of the salient issues in the election, plus the influence of the new electoral system.
I also mobilized about 10 friends to write their own letters, thinking that the Times' staff would be less likely to ignore all of us.
But they did.
We each got an automated reply telling us that our letters had been received.
But no one's was published.
Professor June Teufel Dreyer
Department of Political Science
University of Miami
Johnny replies: Given that the only interest the New York Times management has in Taiwanese politics is the simian commentaries of Beijing hackocrats, you shouldn't be too surprised if the letters editor looked at your efforts and thought, "Why would anyone nitpick about such matters?" and threw all your missives in the trash can.
Then again, it is possible that all 11 letters got redirected to one Phil Connors, Esq, in Punxsutawney by a Chinese operative at the post office. I hope this is true, because then we could establish that Chinese operatives really do have a sense of humor.
One way or another, your students over there in the Hanging Chad State have a splendid case study at their disposal of how respectable US media outlets angle their news to the point of distortion -- or at least non sequitur.
And anyway, what's with the New York Times' six column format? Just 'cos everyone else is doing it doesn't make it right. I bought a copy while I was in the US last year and wondered how on Earth New York's dog owners can wrap droppings in it -- it's so narrow that the contents are bound to tumble out the side!
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers