The 'Times,' it ain't changin'
Dear Johnny,
Yes, I read something objectionable about Taiwan.
The front page headline on the New York Times the day after the legislative elections was "China win in Taiwan election," directing the reader to an article further back.
I wrote the Times immediately explaining that the election hadn't been fought on unification (why do they keep using "re"unification, with its implication that Taiwan was once part of the People's Republic of China?), that the KMT hasn't promised to put the island under Beijing's control, etc.
And I named a few of the salient issues in the election, plus the influence of the new electoral system.
I also mobilized about 10 friends to write their own letters, thinking that the Times' staff would be less likely to ignore all of us.
But they did.
We each got an automated reply telling us that our letters had been received.
But no one's was published.
Professor June Teufel Dreyer
Department of Political Science
University of Miami
Johnny replies: Given that the only interest the New York Times management has in Taiwanese politics is the simian commentaries of Beijing hackocrats, you shouldn't be too surprised if the letters editor looked at your efforts and thought, "Why would anyone nitpick about such matters?" and threw all your missives in the trash can.
Then again, it is possible that all 11 letters got redirected to one Phil Connors, Esq, in Punxsutawney by a Chinese operative at the post office. I hope this is true, because then we could establish that Chinese operatives really do have a sense of humor.
One way or another, your students over there in the Hanging Chad State have a splendid case study at their disposal of how respectable US media outlets angle their news to the point of distortion -- or at least non sequitur.
And anyway, what's with the New York Times' six column format? Just 'cos everyone else is doing it doesn't make it right. I bought a copy while I was in the US last year and wondered how on Earth New York's dog owners can wrap droppings in it -- it's so narrow that the contents are bound to tumble out the side!
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US