I would like to share my travel experience in response to the Taipei Times' recent articles on ratings of Taiwan as a tourist destination.
I have often traveled to Taipei on business with Eslite Books, but this is my first time as a tourist in southern Taiwan.
I have been staying with friends in Chiayi and have visited the Kuantzuling (關子嶺) hot springs, Alishan (阿里山), Chiayi City, Tainan and Anping Fort (安平古堡) in the past 10 days. On all these trips, the Taiwanese have been so helpful and friendly: An elderly lady in Chiayi offered me her bottled orange juice to save me from waiting while they squeezed a new one; a couple in Nice department store in Chiayi City gave me their shopping vouchers.
The Tourism Bureau should be proud to be able to offer visitors such wonderful and different experiences. Taiwan needs to advertise in magazines and on TV in the UK to compete with other Asian destinations such as Thailand and Hong Kong. I think the Taiwan experience is unique to Taiwan.
I am taking the high-speed train tomorrow to Taipei, where I'll be staying for three days before flying back to the UK.
I will be back again as a tourist, and Taiwan should be proud of the diverse and wonderful experiences it can offer travelers.
Andrew Green
Somerset, England
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS