THE RESULT OF the legislative elections was difficult for everyone in the pan-green camp. Questions abound on why it happened and what the green camp should do next. Pro-pan-blue media have given two explanations for the results: It was a vote of no confidence in President Chen Shui-bian (
There are two reasons why the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is making much of these interpretations. First, the KMT wants to lead the public into thinking that Ma Ying-jeou (
A closer look at the election system and structure would reveal the reasons behind the DPP loss.
First, the change to a new single-member district, two-vote system. In 2005, former DPP chairman Lin I-hsiung (
A second cause of the DPP loss was the vote captains. In Yunlin County, a 27-year-old woman who had just finished her studies, never been elected to any local council and lacked political experience and qualifications became a egislator because her father had a large power base in the area. This happened while many honest, skilled, senior legislators lost, demonstrating the effectiveness of a vote captain culture at the grassroots level. The KMT has at least 250 times more assets than the DPP and can support its vote captain culture with injections of cash. This made the election battle very unbalanced, but it is the price the country had to pay for a peaceful transfer of power, and it must be endured.
The third reason behind the DPP loss was the economy. Since the green camp came to power, the Chinese Communist Party, together with the KMT, has lamented the state of affairs in Taiwan, exaggerating Taiwan's economic problems and saying the public couldn't make ends meet because the DPP government was ineffective. Even former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) went along with this and talked about how the public was suffering. And with the KMT-controlled media contributing to the distortion of facts and reinforcing this message of an economic malaise, many were swayed.
A fourth reason was overly high expectations. After the fall of communist regimes in Eastern Europe, most democratic parties that came to power faced the same problem after taking office for the first time: very high expectations from the public. As soon as a member of the government was found to be corrupt, the party's supporters became enraged. The old media added fuel to the fire and, as a result, the public became even less forgiving of the new government than the old one. Often, democratic governments that had come to power in these new East European democracies lost in the next elections. However, as the public gradually gained more faith in democracy, the democratic parties became more successful.
Under the KMT and China's watch, Taiwan's situation is more difficult than that of East European countries. The DPP may have suffered in the elections, but as long as Taiwanese don't give up their faith in democracy and remain steadfast in upholding Taiwanese identity, Taiwan can still succeed in its quest for normalization. The pan-green camp must now leave all its old complaints behind, refrain from fingerpointing, stop being discouraged or disappointed and put all its efforts into winning over the public and outrunning the KMT in the March presidential election.
Cao Changqing is a political commentator based in the US.
TRANSLATED BY ANNA STIGGELBOUT
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,