TWO PUBLIC EVENTS, one in Taiwan and the other in China, have brought some much-needed clarity to the often murky and sometimes tense confrontation across the Taiwan Strait.
In Taipei, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) laid out explicitly what his policy toward China would be if he were elected in March. Calling it his "three noes" policy, Ma said he would pursue a policy of no negotiations for unification, no pursuit of de jure independence and no use of force by either side of the Taiwan Strait. He said that polls showed a majority of Taiwanese prefer the status quo to either unification or independence.
In Beijing, the visiting commander of US military forces in the Pacific and Asia, Admiral Timothy Keating, was explicit in asserting the right of US warships to sail through the Taiwan Strait. Beijing considers the strait to be an internal waterway under Chinese jurisdiction.
"We don't need China's permission to go through the Taiwan Straits [sic]," Keating said in response to a Chinese reporter at a meeting with Chinese, American and other foreign correspondents. "It's international waters. We will exercise our free right of passage whenever and wherever we choose as we have done repeatedly in the past and we'll do in the future."
Ma declared his "three noes" policy at a conference in Taipei a few days after the KMT scored a sweeping victory in Saturday's legislative elections. The KMT won 81 seats in the 113-seat legislature against 27 for the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP).
While Ma is favored to win the March election, he and other KMT leaders cautioned that there are no guarantees. In democracies, voters have a way of going to the ballot box and voting as they please, confounding the political pundits.
In asserting that his government would not negotiate with China over unification, Ma served a notice that may unsettle Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and other Chinese leaders who have made clear they prefer Ma and the KMT to Chen and the DPP.
Moreover, Ma has taken pains in recent years to assure the electorate that he shares their identity even though he was born in Hong Kong of parents who came from China. In an interview two years ago, he said flatly: "I am Taiwanese."
He also reminded Chinese leaders that they had used force, firing missiles at Taiwan in trying to influence an election in 1996.
That, Ma said, "served only to alienate Taiwan people's hearts and minds against the mainland and alarm the international community over its rash behavior."
In Beijing, Keating was making his second visit to China as part of a continuing US effort to preclude Chinese leaders from miscalculating US military capabilities and intentions. Equally important, Keating and a senior Pentagon official, James Shinn, sought to discern China's intentions behind a steady expansion of its armed forces.
Beijing officials mainly reiterated known positions, saying Taiwan was a most sensitive issue, that the US should stop selling arms to Taiwan and that China posed no threat to the US.
Keating responded by repeating the "one China" policy of the US by renewing proposals for military exchanges and by asserting that the US seeks to avoid confrontations.
But when the Chinese reporter asked what was behind the USS Kitty Hawk's recent transit of the Taiwan Strait after being denied a port call in Hong Kong, Keating broke out of diplo-speak to lay out the longstanding US position that those are international waters.
He softened that by saying: "We don't want to be confrontational about this."
If the Chinese wanted to know why US ships were there, "we're going to tell them the truth," he said.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past