A CERTAIN POLITICIAN recently remarked that Aborigines must be educated ("Ma comment sparks Aboriginal fury," Dec. 26, page 3). So let's discuss the problems of Aboriginal education.
In December 2006, a case of corporal punishment was reported at Chungcheng Elementary School in Yuli Township (
A student from a local Amis Aboriginal community had failed to turn in a homework assignment, and he had not memorized an assigned passage of The Analects.
The teacher then beat the student to the point that it left severe bruising on his buttocks.
However, locals passed on rumors that the teacher had been taken to court because the Aborigines wanted to make hay out of the case and get some money.
A Han Taiwanese teacher at a school in an Aboriginal area once complained to me that Aboriginal children are difficult to teach: They are very active, he said, and not inclined to study.
I responded by asking him whether he had ever asked his students why they didn't do their homework, and whether he had ever witnessed their family environment.
On this point, Hsiao Jau-jiun (
Of course, many people reject cultural difference as an explanation for differences in learning. But, as Professor Hsiao points out, these factors cannot be concretely outlined; they can only be discovered by an observer with an open mind that is ready to accept diversity.
The poor academic performance of Aboriginal students is a problem rooted in the fundamental principles of the education that Aborigines receive.
The current format of treating Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students in the same way conceals an unequal point of departure at its core.
More than 98 percent of the educational materials used by Aboriginal children are based on a non-Aboriginal viewpoint.
This kind of environment poses a great hurdle for personal and cultural identification, as well as the intellectual development of Aboriginal students.
I have profound doubts as to whether this kind of education can produce intellectuals who are Aboriginal but can also understand their ethnic identity and cultural heritage, or even acknowledge their identity.
The problems that we must resolve are cultural prejudice and the fundamental principles of education as applied to Aboriginal children.
A solution to this problem should come from the Council of Indigenous Peoples and Aboriginal legislators, who must work with the academic community and non-governmental organizations to develop an educational program that truly belongs to Aboriginal people.
Saiviq Kisasa is a research assistant at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US