A CERTAIN POLITICIAN recently remarked that Aborigines must be educated ("Ma comment sparks Aboriginal fury," Dec. 26, page 3). So let's discuss the problems of Aboriginal education.
In December 2006, a case of corporal punishment was reported at Chungcheng Elementary School in Yuli Township (
A student from a local Amis Aboriginal community had failed to turn in a homework assignment, and he had not memorized an assigned passage of The Analects.
The teacher then beat the student to the point that it left severe bruising on his buttocks.
However, locals passed on rumors that the teacher had been taken to court because the Aborigines wanted to make hay out of the case and get some money.
A Han Taiwanese teacher at a school in an Aboriginal area once complained to me that Aboriginal children are difficult to teach: They are very active, he said, and not inclined to study.
I responded by asking him whether he had ever asked his students why they didn't do their homework, and whether he had ever witnessed their family environment.
On this point, Hsiao Jau-jiun (
Of course, many people reject cultural difference as an explanation for differences in learning. But, as Professor Hsiao points out, these factors cannot be concretely outlined; they can only be discovered by an observer with an open mind that is ready to accept diversity.
The poor academic performance of Aboriginal students is a problem rooted in the fundamental principles of the education that Aborigines receive.
The current format of treating Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal students in the same way conceals an unequal point of departure at its core.
More than 98 percent of the educational materials used by Aboriginal children are based on a non-Aboriginal viewpoint.
This kind of environment poses a great hurdle for personal and cultural identification, as well as the intellectual development of Aboriginal students.
I have profound doubts as to whether this kind of education can produce intellectuals who are Aboriginal but can also understand their ethnic identity and cultural heritage, or even acknowledge their identity.
The problems that we must resolve are cultural prejudice and the fundamental principles of education as applied to Aboriginal children.
A solution to this problem should come from the Council of Indigenous Peoples and Aboriginal legislators, who must work with the academic community and non-governmental organizations to develop an educational program that truly belongs to Aboriginal people.
Saiviq Kisasa is a research assistant at the Institute of Sociology at Academia Sinica.
TRANSLATED BY ANGELA HONG
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers