The Directorate General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) has announced an economic growth rate of 6.92 percent for the third quarter, up from 5.24 percent for the second quarter. This is 2.45 percentage points higher than the government's forecast of 4.47 percent in August and 1.76 percentage points higher than the average forecast of 5.16 percent made by 12 Dow Jones economists. The DGBAS has thus revised its forecast of 4.58 percent to 5.46 percent, an increase of 0.88 percentage points.
The gradual revitalization of the economy has made several politicians lose their bearings. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) vice presidential candidate Vincent Siew (
Last week, Yeh Wan-an (
As national economic statistics follow a set of strict, internationally observed procedures, Wei and Yeh should understand that forecasts and outcomes are often inconsistent and that discrepancies can be large. It is not so much that the statistics are wrong but that the economic environment cannot be controlled.
For example, Singapore's economic growth forecast based on annualized third quarter growth was 6.4 percent, but the final figure was only 4.3 percent -- a discrepancy of 2.1 percent.
As a reflection of the uncertainty of the global economy, the Singaporean government has forecast that growth next year will fall between 4.5 percent and 6.5 percent. The difference of 2 percentage points is meant to accommodate a large discrepancy between the forecast and reality.
As for the US, the forecast annual growth rate based on annualized third quarter figures is 4.9 percent, 1 percentage point higher than the rough forecast of 3.9 percent a month earlier. This is the highest third quarter growth in the last four years. Contrary to expectations, the subprime mortgage crisis didn't have an impact on third quarter growth.
The real manipulators of distorted economic figures are politicians. The question of whether economic growth benefits all sectors of society is a matter of income distribution and whether deteriorating trade conditions will hurt proportional income growth.
Anyone contesting growth figures because of existing income distribution problems is unprofessional or lost in the attempt to manipulate political interests.
During President Chen Shui-bian's (
From a GDP perspective, Taiwan has returned to a potential level of approximately 5 percent growth after undergoing the 2001 economic recession when the global high-tech bubble burst.
It is impressive to see Taiwan's economy retaining such resilience and flexibility after suffering years of political conflict.
However, Taiwan's worsened trade conditions have indeed meant that real GDP, which is used to calculate economic growth, includes a high proportion of illusory income -- according to my estimate, approximately 4 percent in 2004, 6 percent in 2005 and 7 percent last year.
In part, this is a reflection of how domestic industry is climbing the technological ladder, but also that their efforts to develop high-end products have been insufficient.
This is something the government should draw up careful and effective policies to deal with.
Hwan C. Lin is a research fellow at the Taiwan Public Policy Council and associate professor of economics at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte.
Translated by Ted Yang
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS