IN APRIL 2005, with the knowledge that he would never gain the presidential seat, then Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
Perhaps because Lien's successor has a much better chance at the presidency, KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
While the proposal of teaming up with the CCP to suppress independence led the public to chastise President Chen Shui-bian's (
For many years, Taiwan's economy has relied too heavily on China, allowing it to lay economic siege on Taiwan and to manipulate Taiwanese politics.
Many staunch academic supporters of Taiwan's position often warn against the possibility of Taiwan becoming another Hong Kong. Although that is a danger, turning into another Tibet would be even worse.
The Dalai Lama pointed out in a speech to the US Congress 20 years ago that China had sent 7.5 million Han immigrants to Tibet outnumbering the 6 million original Tibetans. China admits that in central and western Tibet -- the Tibet Autonomous Region -- the 1.9 million Tibetans there have become the area's minority.
In March, the Tibetan representative in Japan told Japanese media that China has drawn up further plans to move 20 million Han people to Tibet. He is extremely concerned that should this plan be realized, Tibetan culture and ethnic character will disappear completely.
Although the Taiwanese public elected a new ruling party in 2000, the KMT is kept alive by the wealth it accumulated from corruption during its half a century of autocratic rule and recent aid and investments from a China betting on KMT cooperation.
Recently, the KMT has been promoting cooperation between the KMT and the CCP and preaching the three direct links, which totally compromises national autonomy and security. Ma even publicly announced that he would recognize Chinese academic qualifications if he wins the presidency.
If these policies were implemented, Taiwan's future could be seen in today's Tibet: Taiwan's 23 million people would be marginalized and belittled, our grassroots lifestyle and culture would become diluted or obliterated and education and employment opportunities would be handed over to China. Tibet has a government in exile that can combat China's Tibet -- Taiwan would have no such fulcrum for leverage.
Joining with China to suppress Taiwanese independence is just the first step toward the goal of transforming Taiwan into another Hong Kong. The second step would consist of obliterating Taiwan by transforming it into a new Tibet.
The face-off between pan-green independence and pan-blue unification is a fight for the very existence of Taiwanese values, which should be maintained in every political contest in every election until the KMT gives up their narrow-minded fantasy of cooperating with China.
Chen Gau-tzu is chief secretary of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Angela Hong
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers