IN APRIL 2005, with the knowledge that he would never gain the presidential seat, then Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman Lien Chan (
Perhaps because Lien's successor has a much better chance at the presidency, KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
While the proposal of teaming up with the CCP to suppress independence led the public to chastise President Chen Shui-bian's (
For many years, Taiwan's economy has relied too heavily on China, allowing it to lay economic siege on Taiwan and to manipulate Taiwanese politics.
Many staunch academic supporters of Taiwan's position often warn against the possibility of Taiwan becoming another Hong Kong. Although that is a danger, turning into another Tibet would be even worse.
The Dalai Lama pointed out in a speech to the US Congress 20 years ago that China had sent 7.5 million Han immigrants to Tibet outnumbering the 6 million original Tibetans. China admits that in central and western Tibet -- the Tibet Autonomous Region -- the 1.9 million Tibetans there have become the area's minority.
In March, the Tibetan representative in Japan told Japanese media that China has drawn up further plans to move 20 million Han people to Tibet. He is extremely concerned that should this plan be realized, Tibetan culture and ethnic character will disappear completely.
Although the Taiwanese public elected a new ruling party in 2000, the KMT is kept alive by the wealth it accumulated from corruption during its half a century of autocratic rule and recent aid and investments from a China betting on KMT cooperation.
Recently, the KMT has been promoting cooperation between the KMT and the CCP and preaching the three direct links, which totally compromises national autonomy and security. Ma even publicly announced that he would recognize Chinese academic qualifications if he wins the presidency.
If these policies were implemented, Taiwan's future could be seen in today's Tibet: Taiwan's 23 million people would be marginalized and belittled, our grassroots lifestyle and culture would become diluted or obliterated and education and employment opportunities would be handed over to China. Tibet has a government in exile that can combat China's Tibet -- Taiwan would have no such fulcrum for leverage.
Joining with China to suppress Taiwanese independence is just the first step toward the goal of transforming Taiwan into another Hong Kong. The second step would consist of obliterating Taiwan by transforming it into a new Tibet.
The face-off between pan-green independence and pan-blue unification is a fight for the very existence of Taiwanese values, which should be maintained in every political contest in every election until the KMT gives up their narrow-minded fantasy of cooperating with China.
Chen Gau-tzu is chief secretary of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Angela Hong
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US