Dark days at end of Empire
Dear Johnny,
I find it deplorable for British Foreign Secretary David Miliband to suggest that the UN referendum threatens cross-strait stability (Editorial: "A British warning hardly registers," Dec. 8, page 8). It is more of a threat to peace in the region for supposedly mature democracies like the UK to continue to pander to the wishes of China and give tacit blessing to its oppressive polices and warmongering.
As for the letter from my countryman (Johnny Neihu's Mailbag, Dec. 8, page 8) that appeared to ridicule Taiwanese democracy -- and I apologize to John if it was not meant in that way -- it only goes to prove the worrying trend in education we have here.
I'm afraid I don't have room to list even a fraction of the atrocities committed by Britain throughout its history. However, for those of us who learn our history courtesy of Hollywood, I have one word: Braveheart.
I would like to urge Mr Miliband and the UK government to concentrate on issues closer to home. Even without the rising taxes that make things harder to bear, the state of education, medical care, policing and general behavior and manners of a large proportion of society disappoints me at best, and on darker days, leaves me ashamed to be English.
As to how any of this involves Taiwan, would you agree, Johnny, that there is a real danger that the petty antics and name-calling between Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) will make others consider Taiwan's democracy a laughingstock?
I would urge them to concentrate on building on the things that have made Taiwan great and improving its global image on a more basic level than simply anti-China rhetoric.
It may surprise many Taiwanese to know that I have yet to find an Englishman who has even heard of Taipei 101, let alone know that it is the tallest building in the world. Unsurprisingly, all can picture the Petronas Towers; again, courtesy of Hollywood. None of my work colleagues have placed Taiwan successfully on a map and despite me having corrected them on numerous occasions, most still refer to Thailand every time I talk about my visits there or my Taiwanese wife.
Indeed, the majority only remember Taiwan as the place where their plastic toys were made in the 1970s and 1980s.
Taiwan is a fantastic, beautiful place that should be known for its stunning scenery, culture and quality of life (I know where I'll be retiring) rather than for getting involved in petty squabbles with the People's Republic of China and between its political parties.
Kevin M
Lincolnshire, England
PS: You would not believe how hard it is to get a good naicha over here. Can I have a Red Sun Tea franchise for Christmas?
Johnny replies : I don't give a rat's ass if someone thinks of Taiwan as a laughingstock if that person does not already sympathize with Taiwan's predicament -- or if that person is just plain ignorant.
I also think that you misread John's letter.
If you describe cross-strait tension as a "petty squabble," then I can call the Battle of Britain a lark with toy planes.
As for Taipei 101, I had never heard of it either until you brought it up. I suggest we call in Hollywood to make a sequel to that Petronas Towers movie. In Entrapment II: Take the Plunge, Sean Connery will illegally BASE jump from the Taipei 101 observation deck onto a nude Catherine Zeta-Jones on a parking garage roof.
That'll educate the English.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS