How history should treat Chiang Kai-shek (
To this day, there are still members of the Chiang family on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Central Standing Committee, which shows the close relationship between the family and the party. The KMT, indeed, continues to deify Chiang and portray him as a national hero.
The military oath of loyalty used to be leader, ideology and country, in that order. Major roads all over the country are named after Chiang, and his statue still presides over traffic intersections and educational institutions.
With the dissolution of KMT authoritarian rule, the release of historical documents and the spread of democratic thinking, Chiang's actions are no longer infallible. Chiang disallowed dissent, permitted corruption and abuse of power among his subordinates, and committed criminal acts.
Chiang sent troops to suppress the 228 Incident, lost the civil war in China and fled to Taiwan, where he oversaw the large-scale oppression that was the White Terror, leading to the loss of thousands of lives and political freedom.
The destruction of Chiang's godlike status and the redefinition of his place in history are necessary parts of Taiwan's democratic transition, much like Spain's ongoing reevaluation of late dictator Francisco Franco.
Election concerns were of course one component in the government's decision to change the name Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall to National Taiwan Democracy Memorial Hall and replace the inscription on its main arch, but these actions are also a part of the reevaluation of Chiang's contributions and faults.
These actions are an essential step in the process of lessening psychological trauma in this society.
The next issue to address should be the mausoleums of Chiang and former president Chiang Ching-kuo (
The government should discontinue the honor guard and the two Chiangs should be interred somewhere else. If the Taoyuan County Government really believes the site can bring in 1.7 million visitors annually and create between NT$500 million and NT$800 million in revenue, they are welcome to build a "Chiang Culture Park" to increase local tourism.
A free society does not need heroes capable of other-worldly achievements or warriors of divine perfection. It also doesn't need generous memorial halls based on nostalgia for demagogues nor vast mausoleums for criminals.
Cultural museums or libraries are more appropriate venues for learning about the Chiang family.
A mature society relegates dead dictators to the debates of historians, and does not keep them in shrines for political opportunists.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers