FOLLOWING THE HALVING of legislative seats, the ruling and opposition parties have been negotiating changes to procedures, such as reducing the number of permanent legislative committees to eight and the number of committee conveners to two, while increasing the number of assistants for each legislator.
Other amendments mostly deal with lowering the required number of signatures when signing documents and the number of legislators needed to second a motion.
Significant changes to the electoral system must be accompanied by adjustments to the legislative regulations. However, there is still a large gap between the small adjustments made by the parties in the legislature and public expectations for legislative reform.
For years, in addition to confrontations between the pan-blue and pan-green camps, the strongest criticism against the legislature has been aimed at closed-door negotiations between caucuses, the lack of integrity of lawmakers, inappropriate relations between politicians and business and other conflicts of interest.
But these problems -- those in most urgent need of reform -- are barely addressed in the latest amendments.
Since party negotiation mechanisms became law in 2002, the role of committees was replaced, which turned the legislature's operations into even more of an opaque "black box." The legislature has become a place where a number of lawmakers threaten legislative operations to ensure personal gain.
Although a consensus has been reached to lower the caucus requirement to three legislators in response to the changes, the party caucus negotiation mechanism has not been reformed. For example, adjustments are needed to shorten the four-month negotiation period, to produce and table records of meetings and to prevent lawmakers from overturning committee decisions.
The legislature must vigorously undertake reform of the negotiation mechanism lest it continue to operate without transparency.
In the new legislature, the influence of individual lawmakers will increase, and voters should monitor their integrity and performance. Based on the public's right to know, the future legislature could take the initiative to make a record of the activities of lawmakers.
For example, data on committee attendance and general meetings should be recorded and released online. Voting records should also be available, as well as information on other jobs the legislators concurrently hold, political donations and advocacy, the names of assistants and -- after the Lobbying Law (遊說法) comes into effect in August -- their lobbying history, so that both the public and media outlets can monitor performance.
The future legislature should introduce a strict policy on conflict of interest and amend the Legislators' Conduct Act (
Each party caucus should also keep close tabs on the members and conveners of each committee.
And the rights of a caucus should be suspended for a period of time if any of its lawmakers violate these regulations.
The legislature is the main venue for authoritative distribution of political and economic benefits.
With the new electoral system, the next legislature is likely to have a fresh look. Whether it will be an improvement or a precipitator of further decline will depend on the introduction of a set of transparent regulations.
Wang Yeh-lih is a professor of political science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
RSS