FOLLOWING THE HALVING of legislative seats, the ruling and opposition parties have been negotiating changes to procedures, such as reducing the number of permanent legislative committees to eight and the number of committee conveners to two, while increasing the number of assistants for each legislator.
Other amendments mostly deal with lowering the required number of signatures when signing documents and the number of legislators needed to second a motion.
Significant changes to the electoral system must be accompanied by adjustments to the legislative regulations. However, there is still a large gap between the small adjustments made by the parties in the legislature and public expectations for legislative reform.
For years, in addition to confrontations between the pan-blue and pan-green camps, the strongest criticism against the legislature has been aimed at closed-door negotiations between caucuses, the lack of integrity of lawmakers, inappropriate relations between politicians and business and other conflicts of interest.
But these problems -- those in most urgent need of reform -- are barely addressed in the latest amendments.
Since party negotiation mechanisms became law in 2002, the role of committees was replaced, which turned the legislature's operations into even more of an opaque "black box." The legislature has become a place where a number of lawmakers threaten legislative operations to ensure personal gain.
Although a consensus has been reached to lower the caucus requirement to three legislators in response to the changes, the party caucus negotiation mechanism has not been reformed. For example, adjustments are needed to shorten the four-month negotiation period, to produce and table records of meetings and to prevent lawmakers from overturning committee decisions.
The legislature must vigorously undertake reform of the negotiation mechanism lest it continue to operate without transparency.
In the new legislature, the influence of individual lawmakers will increase, and voters should monitor their integrity and performance. Based on the public's right to know, the future legislature could take the initiative to make a record of the activities of lawmakers.
For example, data on committee attendance and general meetings should be recorded and released online. Voting records should also be available, as well as information on other jobs the legislators concurrently hold, political donations and advocacy, the names of assistants and -- after the Lobbying Law (遊說法) comes into effect in August -- their lobbying history, so that both the public and media outlets can monitor performance.
The future legislature should introduce a strict policy on conflict of interest and amend the Legislators' Conduct Act (
Each party caucus should also keep close tabs on the members and conveners of each committee.
And the rights of a caucus should be suspended for a period of time if any of its lawmakers violate these regulations.
The legislature is the main venue for authoritative distribution of political and economic benefits.
With the new electoral system, the next legislature is likely to have a fresh look. Whether it will be an improvement or a precipitator of further decline will depend on the introduction of a set of transparent regulations.
Wang Yeh-lih is a professor of political science at Tunghai University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath