After 11 years in power, four-term Australian Prime Minister John Howard of the Liberal Party and his center-right coalition were defeated in the election on Nov. 24.
As expected, Labor Party leader Kevin Rudd, a China expert and shadow minister for foreign affairs, and his deputy Julia Gillard will become the new prime minister and deputy prime minister.
The change will have an impact on Taiwan, China and the US.
US President George W. Bush's administration predicted the outcome.
To reverse the impression that Howard has a better relationship with Washington, Bush made a point of meeting Rudd during the APEC summit in Sydney this year.
THREE PILLARS
Despite Rudd's insistence on withdrawing Australian troops from Iraq if he came to power, he maintains that the three pillars of Australia's foreign affairs policy are its relations with the UN, Asia and the US.
Hence, Australian-US strategic cooperation may not undergo any drastic changes, although Australian troops will be gradually withdrawn from Iraq.
Another possible source of difference lies in the opposite stances on the issue of climate change between the new Australian government and the Bush administration, as Rudd is likely to sign the Kyoto Protocol on global warming as soon as possible.
CLOSER TO BEIJING
When it comes to Beijing, Rudd understands Chinese affairs and is seen as much closer to Beijing than Howard was.
In light of China's strategic position after its "peaceful rise," however, Rudd's Cabinet and the US are still standing on the same side, as their strategic cooperation remains unchanged.
As Rudd says, China has brought Australia a lot of hope economically but also a lot of challenges politically, especially in the areas of democratization and protection of human rights.
Thus, Australia and the US will continue to communicate with China to resolve their differences. Rudd is likely to play a key role in the bilateral relationship between China and the US.
REWARDS
Rudd studied Mandarin at National Taiwan Normal University in his younger years. His election as the 26th Australian prime minister is thus a demonstration of the diplomatic rewards of Chinese-language education in Taiwan.
Unfortunately, in recent years, Chinese-language education for foreigners has lagged behind China. Now is therefore a great time for us to review our policy to boost diplomatic diversity.
Australia treats the South Pacific as its sphere of influence, but its policy in the region is often damaged by Taiwanese and Chinese dollar diplomacy.
Thus, Taiwan must also review its South Pacific and Australia policies to be able to seize the chance to improve Taiwan-Australia relations in the Rudd era.
The Taiwanese government must realize that although Rudd studied Mandarin in Taiwan, he is just like his predecessors in that he does not want to commit himself on the sensitive question of whether Australia would send troops to help Taiwan if a cross-strait war breaks out.
And if Australia and China continue to develop their economic and diplomatic relations, the possibility that Canberra will send troops to help Taiwan will be slim.
Huang Kwei-bo is an associate professor in the Department of Diplomacy at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
As the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) reach the point of confidence that they can start and win a war to destroy the democratic culture on Taiwan, any future decision to do so may likely be directly affected by the CCP’s ability to promote wars on the Korean Peninsula, in Europe, or, as most recently, on the Indian subcontinent. It stands to reason that the Trump Administration’s success early on May 10 to convince India and Pakistan to deescalate their four-day conventional military conflict, assessed to be close to a nuclear weapons exchange, also served to
After India’s punitive precision strikes targeting what New Delhi called nine terrorist sites inside Pakistan, reactions poured in from governments around the world. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) issued a statement on May 10, opposing terrorism and expressing concern about the growing tensions between India and Pakistan. The statement noticeably expressed support for the Indian government’s right to maintain its national security and act against terrorists. The ministry said that it “works closely with democratic partners worldwide in staunch opposition to international terrorism” and expressed “firm support for all legitimate and necessary actions taken by the government of India
The recent aerial clash between Pakistan and India offers a glimpse of how China is narrowing the gap in military airpower with the US. It is a warning not just for Washington, but for Taipei, too. Claims from both sides remain contested, but a broader picture is emerging among experts who track China’s air force and fighter jet development: Beijing’s defense systems are growing increasingly credible. Pakistan said its deployment of Chinese-manufactured J-10C fighters downed multiple Indian aircraft, although New Delhi denies this. There are caveats: Even if Islamabad’s claims are accurate, Beijing’s equipment does not offer a direct comparison
To recalibrate its Cold War alliances, the US adopted its “one China policy,” a diplomatic compromise meant to engage with China and end the Vietnam War, but which left Taiwan in a state of permanent limbo. Half a century later, the costs of that policy are mounting. Taiwan remains a democratic, technologically advanced nation of 23 million people, yet it is denied membership in international organizations and stripped of diplomatic recognition. Meanwhile, the PRC has weaponized the “one China” narrative to claim sovereignty over Taiwan, label the Taiwan Strait as its “internal waters” and threaten international shipping routes that carry more
RSS