After 11 years in power, four-term Australian Prime Minister John Howard of the Liberal Party and his center-right coalition were defeated in the election on Nov. 24.
As expected, Labor Party leader Kevin Rudd, a China expert and shadow minister for foreign affairs, and his deputy Julia Gillard will become the new prime minister and deputy prime minister.
The change will have an impact on Taiwan, China and the US.
US President George W. Bush's administration predicted the outcome.
To reverse the impression that Howard has a better relationship with Washington, Bush made a point of meeting Rudd during the APEC summit in Sydney this year.
THREE PILLARS
Despite Rudd's insistence on withdrawing Australian troops from Iraq if he came to power, he maintains that the three pillars of Australia's foreign affairs policy are its relations with the UN, Asia and the US.
Hence, Australian-US strategic cooperation may not undergo any drastic changes, although Australian troops will be gradually withdrawn from Iraq.
Another possible source of difference lies in the opposite stances on the issue of climate change between the new Australian government and the Bush administration, as Rudd is likely to sign the Kyoto Protocol on global warming as soon as possible.
CLOSER TO BEIJING
When it comes to Beijing, Rudd understands Chinese affairs and is seen as much closer to Beijing than Howard was.
In light of China's strategic position after its "peaceful rise," however, Rudd's Cabinet and the US are still standing on the same side, as their strategic cooperation remains unchanged.
As Rudd says, China has brought Australia a lot of hope economically but also a lot of challenges politically, especially in the areas of democratization and protection of human rights.
Thus, Australia and the US will continue to communicate with China to resolve their differences. Rudd is likely to play a key role in the bilateral relationship between China and the US.
REWARDS
Rudd studied Mandarin at National Taiwan Normal University in his younger years. His election as the 26th Australian prime minister is thus a demonstration of the diplomatic rewards of Chinese-language education in Taiwan.
Unfortunately, in recent years, Chinese-language education for foreigners has lagged behind China. Now is therefore a great time for us to review our policy to boost diplomatic diversity.
Australia treats the South Pacific as its sphere of influence, but its policy in the region is often damaged by Taiwanese and Chinese dollar diplomacy.
Thus, Taiwan must also review its South Pacific and Australia policies to be able to seize the chance to improve Taiwan-Australia relations in the Rudd era.
The Taiwanese government must realize that although Rudd studied Mandarin in Taiwan, he is just like his predecessors in that he does not want to commit himself on the sensitive question of whether Australia would send troops to help Taiwan if a cross-strait war breaks out.
And if Australia and China continue to develop their economic and diplomatic relations, the possibility that Canberra will send troops to help Taiwan will be slim.
Huang Kwei-bo is an associate professor in the Department of Diplomacy at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Taiwan might just give up. That’s the argument Simon Shuster made in The Atlantic’s October issue. The US is unreliable, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) leadership is aligned with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Taiwan does not have the military capability to defend itself in a prolonged war without help. What hope does Taiwan have? Quite a bit more, in fact, than Shuster lets on. Shuster points to genuine problems. The first Donald Trump administration had a mostly positive record on Taiwan policy. It regularized the arms sales process, enhanced the military-to-military relationship, and treated Taiwan more like a normal
A Facebook post by Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) earlier this month achieved record levels of engagement — although perhaps inadvertently. In it, he attacked Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator and Taipei mayoral candidate Puma Shen (沈伯洋) for an op-ed published in 2014 discussing drug harm reduction policies. In attempting to stir up fear with talk of community centers, drugs and needles, Chiang’s comment section exploded. More than 100,000 comments poured in within the first two hours; more than 330,000 after the first 12; and more than 400,000 by noon the following day. Rather embarrassingly, many commenters made a point
Last year, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) turned the Double Ten National Day ceremony into a platform for grievances against the government. Yesterday, standing before the president and foreign dignitaries, he warned against Taiwan becoming a “false democracy, in reality a dictatorship.” Then he called for unity. Democratic leaders must tolerate criticism, even on ceremonial occasions, but Han misused his position and a national celebration to insinuate that Taiwan’s elected president was steering the country toward dictatorship and cast himself as a statesman offering reconciliation. Han asked how Taiwan’s security should be examined, using a medical analogy. If he insists on playing
Southeast Asian food delivery platform Grab Holdings Ltd in March applied to acquire Delivery Hero SE’s Foodpanda operations in Taiwan, with the Fair Trade Commission (FTC) scheduled to announce its decision on Oct. 27. On the surface, the deal is a business merger — but in substance, it involves personal data, national geospatial information and digital sovereignty. It cannot be assessed solely in terms of market share and price competition. Grab has extensive and long-standing connections to Chinese capital. In 2015, Chinese ride-hailing firm Didi Chuxing and China Investment Corp, a sovereign wealth fund, invested in Grab. Grab invested in Chinese autonomous-driving
RSS