When the number of legislative seats is halved in the legislative elections in January, the 34 legislators-at-large will make up 30 percent of the legislature's 113 seats. Selecting nominees for legislator-at-large is no longer simply a matter of internal party affairs as local development needs and structural balance must also be considered.
The single-member district system puts a strong emphasis on the welfare of electoral districts, which means that the next legislature's approach to local public affairs will be ruled to a large extent by pork barrel politics, assisted by the legislators-at-large.
There are only four nominees from the area south of Yunlin County on the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) legislators-at-large safe list. Of these, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
If the list had been determined democratically, then outsiders would have had to respect the will of the majority. But the list was determined behind closed doors, and it clearly sacrificed professional image and expertise in the interest of settling electoral district disputes.
In the end, the ranking of the KMT's legislators-at-large clearly gives priority to northern candidates. Perhaps the KMT still sees the south as an inconsequential hinterland. Might that explain why Legislator Steve Chan (詹啟賢) of Tainan was not included on the list?
The KMT is already preparing itself for the worst-case scenario in the elections in the south, so as a national party, it would only be reasonable for it to strive to achieve a balance of regional interests through its legislators-at-large -- the exact opposite of the party's strategy. When it came to the distribution of power within the party, southern Taiwan was the first to be sacrificed.
The result will be that the KMT will be known for its northern bias.
As an elected representative from the south, I do not judge the list from a simple pan-blue or pan-green perspective.
After the number of seats is reduced by half, I think that the influence of legislators-at-large will become increasingly apparent, and parties must then consider the legislative power structure based on potential regional conflicts.
If the poll results go according to the KMT's plan, the pan-blue camp will continue to enjoy an advantage in the legislature. For southern Taiwan, this will result in less access to resources and development opportunities.
Can KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (
Would distributing a greater proportion of legislators-at-large among southern candidates help to balance the inequality between urban and rural areas? The answer inclines toward the affirmative.
Despite this, the KMT has sacrificed the latter for the former in the belief that they can win votes simply by dabbling a little in the south.
Do they really take us southerners for elderly, uneducated country bumpkins?
Chiu Li-li is a Tainan City councilor.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Angela Hong
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers