When the number of legislative seats is halved in the legislative elections in January, the 34 legislators-at-large will make up 30 percent of the legislature's 113 seats. Selecting nominees for legislator-at-large is no longer simply a matter of internal party affairs as local development needs and structural balance must also be considered.
The single-member district system puts a strong emphasis on the welfare of electoral districts, which means that the next legislature's approach to local public affairs will be ruled to a large extent by pork barrel politics, assisted by the legislators-at-large.
There are only four nominees from the area south of Yunlin County on the Chinese Nationalist Party's (KMT) legislators-at-large safe list. Of these, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
If the list had been determined democratically, then outsiders would have had to respect the will of the majority. But the list was determined behind closed doors, and it clearly sacrificed professional image and expertise in the interest of settling electoral district disputes.
In the end, the ranking of the KMT's legislators-at-large clearly gives priority to northern candidates. Perhaps the KMT still sees the south as an inconsequential hinterland. Might that explain why Legislator Steve Chan (詹啟賢) of Tainan was not included on the list?
The KMT is already preparing itself for the worst-case scenario in the elections in the south, so as a national party, it would only be reasonable for it to strive to achieve a balance of regional interests through its legislators-at-large -- the exact opposite of the party's strategy. When it came to the distribution of power within the party, southern Taiwan was the first to be sacrificed.
The result will be that the KMT will be known for its northern bias.
As an elected representative from the south, I do not judge the list from a simple pan-blue or pan-green perspective.
After the number of seats is reduced by half, I think that the influence of legislators-at-large will become increasingly apparent, and parties must then consider the legislative power structure based on potential regional conflicts.
If the poll results go according to the KMT's plan, the pan-blue camp will continue to enjoy an advantage in the legislature. For southern Taiwan, this will result in less access to resources and development opportunities.
Can KMT presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (
Would distributing a greater proportion of legislators-at-large among southern candidates help to balance the inequality between urban and rural areas? The answer inclines toward the affirmative.
Despite this, the KMT has sacrificed the latter for the former in the belief that they can win votes simply by dabbling a little in the south.
Do they really take us southerners for elderly, uneducated country bumpkins?
Chiu Li-li is a Tainan City councilor.
Translated by Perry Svensson and Angela Hong
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS