Taiwan is in a quandary. China is watching like a hawk to prevent it from flapping its wings internationally by, for instance, seeking membership of the UN. And the US is not helping as it doesn't want to offend China. The US is not keen on Taiwan even holding a referendum to elicit the views of its people about UN membership.
China, on the other hand, is steadfast in regarding Taiwan as its territory.
Therefore, any forward movement in the Beijing-Taipei relationship has to be within this parameter. This was made clear by Chinese President Hu Jintao (
He offered to hold peace talks with Taiwan but on the basis of the "one China" principle.
The sharpest reaction to Hu's offer came from President Chen Shui-bian (
Unlike Chen, whose position on Taiwan's independent status is blunt, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), agrees in principle with the "one China" principle, but would like more leeway to interpret it, with some input about its future by the people of Taiwan.
Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Frank Hsieh (謝長廷), is more circumspect. He is not against a peace agreement with China -- but peace cannot be on Beijing's terms. His circumspection reflects divisions in the ruling party with an eye to presidential election.
It would appear that both Ma and Frank (in their different ways) want to maintain some creative ambiguity in any future talks with Beijing.
But China is not for ambiguity. For the present, though, Beijing is keen for Chen to go.
In any case, Beijing seems to believe that time is on its side as far as Taiwan is concerned. And there are reasons for this, as they see it.
First, Taiwan's fractious politics gives Beijing space to subvert its political processes to its advantage. Beijing has worked hard on this by cultivating the KMT leadership.
Second, Taiwan's businesses and its executives are lured by China's large market. This is not only diverting capital and expertise to China but also creating a powerful constituency sympathetic to the China connection. It is reported that Taiwanese investments in China may be as high as US$280 billion.
China is encouraged by its success in isolating Taiwan. Beijing increasingly believes that with through its growing international clout, Taiwan would be even more isolated. This increases internal and external pressure on Taiwan for accommodation with China.
Fourth, with the US over-stretched in the Middle East and its internal politics in an election mode, China has come to acquire important leverage over Washington in international politics.
The US has depended on Beijing to facilitate a deal with North Korea on Pyongyang's nuclear program and is keen to enlist its help against Iran.
Under these circumstances, the US is not keen on complicating its relations with Beijing on the Taiwan question. Hence, Taipei is being pressured into not "annoying" or "provoking" China by promoting initiatives like a referendum on UN membership.
The US pressure on Taiwan would seem to reinforce China's confidence that time is on its side.
At the same time, Beijing continues to threaten Taiwan. Taiwan is in a sense beleaguered, though US commitment against a Chinese attack still holds.
No one can blame Taiwan if it is taking some measures to defend itself against China. Recent press reports show that Taiwan is developing missiles to hit important industrial and military targets in China. It has already done a test run of such a cruise missile.
These reports of Taiwan's countermeasures have certainly rattled Beijing. A Chinese official spokesman warned Taiwanese authorities not to play with fire, because "Whoever plays with fire will get burned."
If Taiwan creates a strong deterrent military force, China's sense that time is on its side might turn out to be a gross miscalculation -- especially when it must also contend with a US commitment to help Taiwan defend itself.
Sushil Seth is a writer based in Australia.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers