Last Wednesday the Cabinet lifted a ban on investments in the Chinese stock market. Suddenly onshore funds and discretionary accounts managed by domestic securities investment trust companies can invest in stocks on the Chinese market, as well as in red-chip shares and H shares on the Hong Kong and Macau markets.
In the past, the government was unwilling to allow onshore funds to invest in the Chinese market because of worries that it would lead to an outflow of funds. There was also concern that the Chinese market was unstable and lacked corporate transparency.
Have all these concerns suddenly disappeared? Will Taiwan be called on to open its markets to Chinese investment?
First, Taiwanese capital is still flowing into China. According to official Chinese statistics, by the end of last year, Taiwanese investment in China totaled US$2.1 billion -- approximately NT$60 billion.
From January to June of this year, China-bound investments amounted to US$600 million, down 33 percent from a year earlier, but China is still Taiwan's top overseas investment destination. This proves that the capital outflow to China hasn't stopped yet.
Second, the Chinese investment market is still unstable. Manipulation of financial markets is still a serious issue in China. The average price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio on the Shanghai Stock Exchange Composite index is over 40, and the Shenzhen index P/E ratio is 60.
This is far higher than the P/E ratio of 17 of the Taiwan Stock Exchange. In addition, many listed companies in China are financially unsound, which means that these figures cannot be verified and that real P/E ratios could be higher still.
Third, risks increase as the Chinese and Hong Kong stock markets soar. This year both the Chinese and Hong Kong stock markets have seen a major surge, and this has increased investment risk.
The Cabinet lifted the restrictions on domestic funds investing in China with the hope that the relaxation would allow investment funds to carry out some asset allocation and enhance their risk management abilities. In my view, however, this will only increase future risk while promoting investment in the Chinese and Hong Kong markets.
Beyond these questions, there is the concern that the government will be trapped in a dispute over whether to allow Chinese investments in Taiwan. The Cabinet has long insisted that allowing Chinese investment in the Taiwanese stock market would pose a danger to the nation's economic safety.
How can it now justify lifting the ban on onshore funds investing in the Chinese stock market when financial circles, for example, demand that it allow Chinese investment in Taiwan based on the principle of reciprocity?
Policies should be consistent and predictable. On one hand, the government restricts Taiwanese capital flows to China, while on the other hand, it adopts a policy of deregulation.
On one hand, it cautions the public about investing in Chinese stock markets because of high risk, but on the other hand, it relaxes restrictions and allows mutual funds to invest in China because that will enhance their risk management capabilities.
Such contradictory policies are quite difficult for investors to predict, and they are unfair to law-abiding people. The government shouldn't pump out policies just because it wants to offer "a benefit of the week." What the government should focus on now is how to offer consistent and reasonable policies to increase public confidence in both the government and its policies.
Fung Kuo-hao is an associate professor and dean of the Department of Public Finance and Taxation at Hsing Kuo University of Management.
Translated by Ted Yang
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
RSS