I cannot agree with Huang Tien-lin (
His analysis seems to be based on a fundamentally flawed presumption that increasing trade with China is a zero-sum game for Taiwan. Instead of looking solely at Taiwan's market share for European trade he should consider the whole picture.
Have Taiwanese exports increased over the last six years? Undoubtedly. So, too, has China's share of European trade. But the two are inextricably linked -- increased Taiwanese exports to China contribute directly to Chinese exports to Europe (and elsewhere) and the rising trade helps create or protect jobs and income in Taiwan, especially in higher value-added areas.
Nor are European companies neglecting Taiwan in favour of China. Many large and medium sized British companies operate successfully in both economies.
The main deterrent to them doing more business here is not the rival attraction of China but the host of regulations imposed by the Taiwanese government itself, supposedly to protect domestic companies from Chinese competition.
On the specific issue of air services, Huang should ask himself why it is that at a time when EVA Air is withdrawing its services to Paris, there are now 11 flights daily between London and Hong Kong, not to mention many more from Hong Kong to other European cities.
Clearly, demand in Hong Kong alone is nowhere near enough to justify this level of service. Rather, it reflects Hong Kong's role as a gateway city to China. If the administration here was to allow direct flights across the Taiwan Strait I have little doubt that EVA Air and China Airlines would reap immediate benefits by using Taipei similarly as a hub city for their own long-haul routes.
The real danger to Taiwan's survival will come not from embracing globalization and allowing Taiwanese businessmen to compete internationally but from trying to oppose change through isolationist policies.
Michael Reilly
Director
British Trade and Cultural Office, Taipei
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers