Veteran Amazon pilots such as Fernando Galvao Bezerra are hard men to shock. During 20 years in aviation, Bezerra, 45, has ferried prostitutes and wildcat miners to remote, lawless goldmines. He has taxied wealthy loggers between ranches, lost countless colleagues to malaria and once survived when his plane plummeted out of the sky.
But as his 10-seater Cessna banked over a vast expanse of burning rainforest in the state of Mato Grosso, the pilot, who now works for the environmental group Greenpeace, was virtually speechless.
"Holy shit," he blurted over the plane's public-address system, as the plane swung sharply to the right towards an image of destruction which owed more to a scene from Apocalypse Now than the Amazon rainforest.
"Just look at the size of what this guy is burning," he said.
It is burning season in Brazil and across the Amazon region, where illegal loggers, cattle ranchers and a growing number of soy producers continue their advance into the world's largest tropical forest, similar scenes are taking place. In August government satellites registered 16,592 fires across Brazil, the overwhelming majority in the Amazon.
For environmentalists the fires are one of the first indications that deforestation is once again on the rise. Over the last two years fears for the future of the Amazon have been tempered by news of a reduction in deforestation. In August the Brazilian government heralded a 30 percent drop in rainforest destruction -- the result, it said, of a government deforestation plan launched in March 2004. The plan outlined the creation of conservation units and 19 anti-deforestation units in deforestation hotspots such as Novo Progresso and Apui.
Great achievement
Brazilian Environment Minister Marina Silva claimed the drop was a clear indication that the Action Plan for Amazon Deforestation Prevention and Control was working.
"It is a great achievement for Brazilian society," she said.
Many, however, believe the good news is about to run out.
Already there are signs that rainforest destruction is gathering speed. Deforestation in the states of Mato Grosso and Para is reportedly rising, with chainsaws and forest fires levelling thousands of hectares of pristine forest. Figures released last week by Brazil's space agency, INPE, show that between May and July there was a 200 percent rise in deforestation in Mato Grosso.
Further north, in the Amazon state of Para, local ranchers and environmental activists claim a similar process is under way. Flying over the southwestern corner of Para the tell-tale signs that logging continues at a staggering rate are everywhere: in the illegal dirt tracks that trail through the forest and the trucks that are dotted along them; in the charred trees that litter the landscape; and most strikingly in the newly deforested areas, which have turned the landscape into a messy patchwork of dark green and dull brown.
"It [the level of deforestation] is definitely going to rise," said Agamenon da Silva Menezes, the president of the Rural Workers Union in the Amazon town of Novo Progresso and one of the region's most powerful farmers.
"Lula [president of Brazil] says what he says because it is beneficial for him. But this year they have chopped down much more. What I am supposed to say to the guys [to stop them?]" Menezes said.
Menezes compared the illegal actions of the loggers to the US invasion of Iraq. If US President George W. Bush could attack a country out of financial interest, why could the loggers not do the same to the rainforest, he said.
"If you were stood next to your house and there was a mahogany tree next to you which would be worth 5,000 reais [US$2,755] if you chopped it down and your son was there crying out with hunger what would you do?" he said.
Activists claim that the spike in deforestation is a sign that the government's action plan has been largely ineffective. They argue that the recent reductions owe more to external economic factors such as the market price of soy and beef.
With ranchers now looking to cash in on rising prices, Marcelo Marquesini, a former inspector for Ibama (Brazilian ministry of the environment's enforcement agency) who now works for Greenpeace, says the outlook for the rainforest is bleak.
"Brazilian society has to celebrate the reduction of deforestation over these three years. It genuinely did fall," said Marquesini, whose organization will next month launch a report criticizing the government's failure to control this notoriously lawless region.
But "everything now leads us to believe that deforestation is going to rise again," he said.
On the frontline of the government's battle against deforestation are men such as Decio Luiz Motta, a fresh-faced 38-year-old environmental inspector from Rio de Janeiro who heads a six-man task force in the dusty frontier town of Novo Progresso.
Sitting at a rickety wooden table in the unit's improvised HQ, Motta said progress was being made, pointing to the apprehension of 13 lorries carrying illegal wood the previous day.
"Just our being here reduces what is happening," he said. "The infrastructure we have is much better, you have people who know how to use satellite imagery, GPS [global positioning system]. It used to be much more about following your nose. The monitoring teams would see smoke coming from a certain area and head there to check it out. Now we are much better equipped for this work."
Yet the challenges facing such inspectors are clear. Motta's team has just three cars to police a huge and remote area of rainforest, for example.
The collusion of local residents with the loggers also made tackling deforestation more difficult. Motta claimed that after a recent seizure of illegal wood in the nearby town of Castelo dos Sonhos the local gas stations began to boycott the government inspectors, putting their vehicles temporarily out of action.
The region's loggers meanwhile are adamant that as long as the government gives them no economically viable alternative to logging, the deforestation will continue.
"It is a farce," Menezes said. "How are you going to take an area that has been mined for 20 years and tell me it is a conservation unit all of a sudden?"
Zero deforestation
He described the idea that a policy of "zero deforestation" could be introduced as "the biggest load of rubbish I have ever heard."
"Where is he [President Lula] going to get 30,000 soldiers from to police the insides of this whole forest?" Menezes asked.
Hundreds of meters over the burning forest Paulo Adario, the Amazon director of Greenpeace, let out a sigh of resignation.
"It's like a scene from a world war," he said, gazing down at the forest, which now more resembled the aftermath of a napalm bombing.
"It is forbidden to sell cocaine, it's illegal to deal marijuana and it's illegal to molest little children," Adario said with mix of frustration and irony. "And, as you can see, it is also illegal to destroy the Amazon rainforest."
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers