The Democratic Progressive Party's (DPP) 12th national congress last month passed the party's "normal country" resolution. The party considers this a significant development that will have an impact on the presidential election next year and also serve as an index for party unity.
After researching the meaning of "country" for the purpose of my teaching, I have found that the public's understanding of the concept is too narrow, and we almost seem paranoid in the way we have trapped ourselves in a cul de sac, while blaming an imaginary enemy.
The fact is that Taiwan is a normal country in every aspect and there's no need for us to look down on ourselves.
There are many ways to look at the definition of "country." The 192 UN members and observer states are de jure independent states.
There are nine de facto independent states, including the Republic of China which is currently recognized by 24 countries; six independent states that are not internationally recognized, including Abkhazia, Nagorno-Karabakh, Northern Cyprus, Somaliland, South Ossetia and Transnistria; two states that are recognized by many countries but not yet independent, namely Palestine and Western Sahara; and five territories whose sovereignty is more controversial than Taiwan's, namely, Jubaland, Puntland, Cabinda, Kosovo and Kurdistan.
Also there are 58 dependent territories administered by Australia, Denmark, France, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, the UK and the US.
Currently, 71 entities are excluded from the UN. If Taiwan's situation is considered tragic, then the people of the 70 other entities should be overwhelmed with sorrow.
The World Bank classifies its 208 members into four categories according to their per capita GNP. The organization places 58 economies in the low income category, US$905 or less; 54 in lower middle income category, US$906 to US$3,595; 40 economies in the upper middle income category, US$3,596 to US$11,115; and 55 in the high income category, US$11,116 or more. Of those in the high income category, 24 are members of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.
Taiwan's per capita GNP last year was US$16,098, higher than that of more than 150 countries, placing it in the middle of the high income category. As the Taiwan's economy is so strong, the government should ponder such long-term goals as the improvement of living standards and education instead of sticking to short-term issues and worrying the public.
The term "Third World" was coined by French economist Alfred Sauvy in an article in 1952 to refer to the countries that belonged neither to the industrialized capitalist world nor to the industrialized communist bloc.
Most of these countries are what is now called developing countries. IN 1991, after the collapse of the Soviet Union, the UN proposed the Human Development Index (HDI) to replace the term "Third World." The HDI measures well-being, education and economic performance.
What is the HDI for Taiwan then? We will know after Taiwan enters the UN.
The International Movement ATD Fourth World, an organization that fights extreme poverty, has shown that there are people in developed and developing countries who are fighting for dignity every day and who have not been able to enjoy the fruits of their ancestors.
While fighting over issues such as national competitiveness and economic growth, have we ever considered our international responsibilities as a normal country?
Mao Ching-chen is an associate professor in the Library and Information Science Department at Fu Jen Catholic University.
Translated by Ted Yang
Jan. 1 marks a decade since China repealed its one-child policy. Just 10 days before, Peng Peiyun (彭珮雲), who long oversaw the often-brutal enforcement of China’s family-planning rules, died at the age of 96, having never been held accountable for her actions. Obituaries praised Peng for being “reform-minded,” even though, in practice, she only perpetuated an utterly inhumane policy, whose consequences have barely begun to materialize. It was Vice Premier Chen Muhua (陳慕華) who first proposed the one-child policy in 1979, with the endorsement of China’s then-top leaders, Chen Yun (陳雲) and Deng Xiaoping (鄧小平), as a means of avoiding the
The last foreign delegation Nicolas Maduro met before he went to bed Friday night (January 2) was led by China’s top Latin America diplomat. “I had a pleasant meeting with Qiu Xiaoqi (邱小琪), Special Envoy of President Xi Jinping (習近平),” Venezuela’s soon-to-be ex-president tweeted on Telegram, “and we reaffirmed our commitment to the strategic relationship that is progressing and strengthening in various areas for building a multipolar world of development and peace.” Judging by how minutely the Central Intelligence Agency was monitoring Maduro’s every move on Friday, President Trump himself was certainly aware of Maduro’s felicitations to his Chinese guest. Just
A recent piece of international news has drawn surprisingly little attention, yet it deserves far closer scrutiny. German industrial heavyweight Siemens Mobility has reportedly outmaneuvered long-entrenched Chinese competitors in Southeast Asian infrastructure to secure a strategic partnership with Vietnam’s largest private conglomerate, Vingroup. The agreement positions Siemens to participate in the construction of a high-speed rail link between Hanoi and Ha Long Bay. German media were blunt in their assessment: This was not merely a commercial win, but has symbolic significance in “reshaping geopolitical influence.” At first glance, this might look like a routine outcome of corporate bidding. However, placed in
China often describes itself as the natural leader of the global south: a power that respects sovereignty, rejects coercion and offers developing countries an alternative to Western pressure. For years, Venezuela was held up — implicitly and sometimes explicitly — as proof that this model worked. Today, Venezuela is exposing the limits of that claim. Beijing’s response to the latest crisis in Venezuela has been striking not only for its content, but for its tone. Chinese officials have abandoned their usual restrained diplomatic phrasing and adopted language that is unusually direct by Beijing’s standards. The Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs described the
RSS