One thing that has contributed to friction among the nation's ethnic groups is the unbalanced distribution of welfare funds, an issue that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration has failed to address, despite its repeated calls for "transitional justice."
A glance at the Executive Yuan's annual budgets for next year reveals the reason for growing criticism among pan-green supporters frustrated with the DPP government for not acting to implement fair welfare policies.
How can the DPP depict itself as a knight in shining armor, here to bring us social justice, but content itself with continuing the policies of the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime -- policies that pander to the interests of specific groups.
According to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, the central government's proposed spending for the next fiscal year is NT$1.7 trillion.
Defense spending accounts for the largest share, at some NT$340 billion, or one-fifth of the total. The budget for the Ministry of National Defense is followed by funding for the Ministry of Education at NT$150 billion.
Most people can agree it's reasonable to prioritize our defense and education. But how about this mind-boggling tidbit: The agency with the third-highest budget is the Veteran Affairs Commission (VAC). This, despite the fact that there are only 500,000 veterans, according to the commission. But the central government is allotting the commission NT$130 billion -- or 8.2 percent -- of total spending.
Farmers and laborers account for a large proportion of our workforce, yet the Council of Agricultural Affairs (COA) has been allocated only NT$96 billion -- or 5.7 percent -- of next year's budget. The Council of Labor Affairs (CLA), meanwhile, will get NT$66 billion -- or 3.9 percent -- of the total.
There is no doubt that veterans have contributed to the nation, but is the contribution of farmers and laborers so small? What is the explanation for the unreasonably high appropriation of funds for the VAC compared with those allotted to the COA and CLA?
The government is continuing a policy begun under the KMT regime that gives a disproportionate amount of welfare to veterans -- mostly soldiers who accompanied Chiang Kai-shek's (
They not only enjoy housing that is almost free, purchased by the government, but they receive housing subsidies and monthly subsidies of NT$13,550 or more -- benefits that are passed on from generation to generation.
It is no secret that the majority of DPP supporters are blue-collar workers, including farmers and laborers. But what has the DPP in the last seven years done to improve their living standards?
For one, President Chen Shui-bian's (
If the DPP administration can't remember what it is working for and show some progress toward goals that helped it win the last two presidential elections, it is unfit to call itself a friend of social justice.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past