One thing that has contributed to friction among the nation's ethnic groups is the unbalanced distribution of welfare funds, an issue that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) administration has failed to address, despite its repeated calls for "transitional justice."
A glance at the Executive Yuan's annual budgets for next year reveals the reason for growing criticism among pan-green supporters frustrated with the DPP government for not acting to implement fair welfare policies.
How can the DPP depict itself as a knight in shining armor, here to bring us social justice, but content itself with continuing the policies of the former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) regime -- policies that pander to the interests of specific groups.
According to the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, the central government's proposed spending for the next fiscal year is NT$1.7 trillion.
Defense spending accounts for the largest share, at some NT$340 billion, or one-fifth of the total. The budget for the Ministry of National Defense is followed by funding for the Ministry of Education at NT$150 billion.
Most people can agree it's reasonable to prioritize our defense and education. But how about this mind-boggling tidbit: The agency with the third-highest budget is the Veteran Affairs Commission (VAC). This, despite the fact that there are only 500,000 veterans, according to the commission. But the central government is allotting the commission NT$130 billion -- or 8.2 percent -- of total spending.
Farmers and laborers account for a large proportion of our workforce, yet the Council of Agricultural Affairs (COA) has been allocated only NT$96 billion -- or 5.7 percent -- of next year's budget. The Council of Labor Affairs (CLA), meanwhile, will get NT$66 billion -- or 3.9 percent -- of the total.
There is no doubt that veterans have contributed to the nation, but is the contribution of farmers and laborers so small? What is the explanation for the unreasonably high appropriation of funds for the VAC compared with those allotted to the COA and CLA?
The government is continuing a policy begun under the KMT regime that gives a disproportionate amount of welfare to veterans -- mostly soldiers who accompanied Chiang Kai-shek's (
They not only enjoy housing that is almost free, purchased by the government, but they receive housing subsidies and monthly subsidies of NT$13,550 or more -- benefits that are passed on from generation to generation.
It is no secret that the majority of DPP supporters are blue-collar workers, including farmers and laborers. But what has the DPP in the last seven years done to improve their living standards?
For one, President Chen Shui-bian's (
If the DPP administration can't remember what it is working for and show some progress toward goals that helped it win the last two presidential elections, it is unfit to call itself a friend of social justice.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers