In an interview with Germany's Der Spiegel magazine, the reporter asked President Chen Shui-bian (
"This is not a question of envy," Chen replied, "but rather a question that if the Dalai Lama can, why can't Chen Shui-bian? If the Tibetan government in exile can, why can't the Taiwanese government?"
After the emotions aroused by the Sept. 15 Peace Rally in support of Taiwan's UN membership bid and at a time when Taiwan is facing diplomatic difficulties and strong opposition from the US, which believes that the UN referendum is part of the Democratic Progressive Party's election campaign, we should give serious consideration to what Taiwan's independence movement can learn from its Tibetan counterpart.
Tibet is economically weaker than Taiwan and it is politically much worse off than Taiwan owing to its proximity to China. Nevertheless, Tibet has far stronger support in the international community than Taiwan. While the Dalai Lama was received by US President George W. Bush at the White House, Chen was restricted to a transit stopover in remote Alaska.
What can Taiwan learn from Tibet?
First, the whole Western world has been deeply touched by the Dalai Lama and Tibet, and this has nothing to do with money or clever strategic considerations. Rather, it comes from basic human rights values that in effect are based on Buddhist compassion, and it is the Dalai Lama's interactions with scientists, his publications as well as the lecturing and missionary activities by high Tibetan monks that have affected the Western world so profoundly.
Second, the Dalai Lama's method of relying on social movements is acceptable to the West. For example, there is no tradition of Buddhist nuns in Tibet, which is a situation that the Dalai Lama hopes to change. He therefore organized the first international Congress on the role of Buddhist Women in the Sangha in Hamburg, Germany, in July.
In response to strong opposition from certain Tibetans at the conference, the Dalai Lama did not attempt to use authoritarian power to oppress these dissenters, but rather, he attempted to consolidate consensus through debate. This way of building vision using a top-down approach and encouraging active bottom-up participation are the core values of Western transformation management theory.
In contrast, Taiwan only shouts slogans about Taiwanese independence during election campaigns. The mercurial government policies keep changing and the great political agendas proposed by election candidates are no more than a superficial means in their political struggle and their quest for power. No wonder the US has expressed misgivings about the referendum.
Finally, Tibet's insistence on safeguarding its autonomy echoes the US belief that only by dogged determination to pursue happiness can that goal be achieved. If Taiwan does nothing to back up its professed goals by taking real action, it will never gain the US' understanding.
If Taiwan wants to achieve independence, its leaders must consider proposing a set of values that are universally accepted.
The independence movement should strive to build vision through a top-down approach and encourage active bottom-up participation to build a consensus among Taiwanese and win affirmation from the international community.
Only through determination can we establish an independent, democratic and free country.
Bob Kuo is a professor of Information Systems at National Sun Yat-sen University.
Translated by Lin Ya-ti
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US