The week of Aug. 27 was an interesting one in terms of US-Taiwan relations. It started with Deputy US Secretary of State John Negroponte's interview with Phoenix Television in Hong Kong. His comments contained a couple of positive elements, such as the fact that the US "is committed to the defense of Taiwan through the Taiwan Relations Act" and his emphasizing the friendship between Taiwan and the US.
The first statement was a welcome relief, because some folks in Washington have been trying to whittle away at the US commitment to defend Taiwan in case of a Chinese attack.
Such ambiguity about the will of the US to defend Taiwan brings an increased risk of miscalculation on the Chinese side and could lead to armed conflict. Negroponte's remarks brought some much-needed clarity on that point.
However, Negroponte then went on to express opposition to the proposed referendum regarding Taiwan's joining the UN under the name "Taiwan."
Negroponte should understand that the proposed referendum underlines the popular desire of the Taiwanese for their country to be a full and equal member in the international community.
It is also designed to counter China's quite successful strategy of isolating Taiwan internationally.
By stating its opposition, the US administration is playing into China's hands and angering and frustrating those in Taiwan who have worked long and hard to achieve democracy.
The US is playing into China's hands because Beijing is manipulating the US administration to do its bidding. China is frightened because as democracy in Taiwan grows and deeps, Beijing has less influence over Taiwan.
Their tactic is clearly to scare the US into restraining Taiwan's democracy -- and, judging by US words and actions, they seem to be succeeding.
Membership in the UN is an important issue for Taiwanese and it would greatly benefit the US and the international community to get a good sense of how Taiwanese view this issue. It would even be a good example for the Chinese to see how democracy works.
A second episode occurred on Thursday, when Dennis Wilder, senior director for Asian Affairs at the US National Security Council, said that membership in the UN requires statehood.
"Taiwan, or the Republic of China, is not at this point a state in the international community" and "Taiwan is not going to be able to join the United Nations under current circumstances," Wilder said.
Like many policymakers in the international arena, Wilder fails to distinguish between "being a state" and "recognition by other nations."
Let me elaborate.
The most authoritative -- and internationally accepted -- definition of the nation state is given in the 1933 Montevideo Convention on Rights and Duties of States, to which the US is a signatory. The convention gives the following qualifications for recognition as a nation state: One, a defined territory, two, a permanent population and three, a government capable of entering into relations with other states.
Taiwan fulfills all these requirements: It is thus a nation-state. Indeed, it has diplomatic ties with 24 -- albeit small -- countries.
Recognition by other nations, however, is not a pre-condition.
If Wilder would go back into the history of the US, he would find that for the first few years of its existence, the US was not recognized by any nation and that it only attained the number of 24 diplomatic ties in 1848 -- some 72 years after the Declaration of Independence. Was the US therefore not a nation-state during that time?
In the case of Taiwan, the issue is also clouded by the fact that until only 15 years ago, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) still claimed to be the rightful government of China.
That claim was indeed not recognized by the international community.
However, following its remarkable transition to democracy in the early 1990s, Taiwan is now a free and democratic nation and its government deserves to be internationally recognized as such. We should not let Taiwan's future be held hostage by either the unsavory legacy of the KMT's repressive rule or the dictates of the Chinese Communist Party.
Taiwan is a full-fledged democracy of world citizens who want their country to be a full and equal member in the international community.
If we are serious about supporting democracy around the world, then we need to nurture the nation's fragile democracy and support its desire to join international organizations such as the UN and the WHO.
Taiwan can join the UN if the US and other Western nations have the political will to stand up for their basic principles of human rights and democracy.
Gerrit van der Wees is the editor of Taiwan Communique.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In a recent essay, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” a former adviser to US President Donald Trump, Christian Whiton, accuses Taiwan of diplomatic incompetence — claiming Taipei failed to reach out to Trump, botched trade negotiations and mishandled its defense posture. Whiton’s narrative overlooks a fundamental truth: Taiwan was never in a position to “win” Trump’s favor in the first place. The playing field was asymmetrical from the outset, dominated by a transactional US president on one side and the looming threat of Chinese coercion on the other. From the outset of his second term, which began in January, Trump reaffirmed his
It is difficult not to agree with a few points stated by Christian Whiton in his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” and yet the main idea is flawed. I am a Polish journalist who considers Taiwan her second home. I am conservative, and I might disagree with some social changes being promoted in Taiwan right now, especially the push for progressiveness backed by leftists from the West — we need to clean up our mess before blaming the Taiwanese. However, I would never think that those issues should dominate the West’s judgement of Taiwan’s geopolitical importance. The question is not whether
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
RSS