The basic commands of "shoot, move, and communicate" apply to a squad of riflemen on the ground, a flotilla of warships at sea and an armada of bombers in the air. Of the three, communicate can often be the most decisive in making for success or failure. Or, as a battle-hardened corps commander in the army once said, in colorful if somewhat inelegant language: "If you ain't got communications, you ain't got nuthin."
In the Pacific and Asia, the armed forces of the US are undergoing perhaps the most extensive changes since World War II. As an essential element of that transition, the Army has begun to strengthen its communications apparatus to enable the US Army of the Pacific to be transformed from an administrative headquarters to an expeditionary, warfighting command. Upgrading Army communications has so far revolved around two transfers.
First, a signal brigade has been transferred to Fort Shafter, Hawaii, from Fort Meade, Maryland, to become a signal command responsible for Army communications in Hawaii, Alaska, Okinawa and other areas of Japan and wherever else in the Asian-Pacific region soldiers might be deployed. The 311 Signal Command is led by Major General Donna Dacier.
Dacier was quoted in a unit publication as saying that when her command is fully operational later this year the Army of the Pacific could take on any mission "and get safe, secure and reliable communications from the foxhole back to the garrison."
Second, a signal battalion has been moved from South Korea to Hawaii to handle the communications of combat units that might be dispatched to the far corners of the region that extends across the Pacific and Indian Oceans to the east coast of Africa. The 307th Signal Battalion is commanded by Lieutenant Colonel Timothy Walrod.
Walrod, whose unit is also expected to be fully operational by the end of this year, was quoted as giving a wry bit of philosophy to his troops about leaving South Korea to become the newest unit in the Army of the Pacific.
"We have no bad habits, no good habits. We have no reputation [so] we must excel," he said.
Moreover, the transfer of this battalion to Hawaii reflects the steady reduction of US forces in South Korea as the South Korean armed forces have become capable of defending their nation from an attack with minimal US help. That reduction has also been motivated by anti-American outbursts suggesting that US forces are no longer welcome in South Korea.
There are other moves in the works. The Air Force is transferring a combat communications squadron from South Korea to Guam, which is being built up as a bastion in the western Pacific.
That communications unit would support bombers and fighters at Anderson Air Force Base if the aircraft were sent into combat.
Likewise, a "Red Horse" engineering unit is being transferred from South Korea to Guam to help construct new facilities to support aerial operations and infrastructure -- meaning roads, water pipelines, sewage lines and electric power plants and grids.
In addition to providing communications, the signal command must maintain the security of its extensive network of message traffic, telecommunications, radio transmissions and video conference calls. A team of about 15 soldiers has mounted a 24-hour watch in an operations security center to detect routine breakdowns and attempts by hackers to get into the network to disrupt it or steal information.
The center is using a multi-layered defense system to protect the network that includes a series of checkpoints, firewalls, scanners, anti-virus programs and encryption devices, all intended to block intrusions. In the skies above, satellites called Ping Sweep and War Dialer monitors attempts to penetrate the network.
China's Peoples Liberation Army (PLA), for instance, has begun to emphasize information warfare. A recent Pentagon report asserted that the PLA had established units "to develop viruses to attack enemy computer systems and networks, and tactics and measures to protect friendly computer systems and networks."
A researcher at the conservative Heritage Foundation, John Tkacik, asserted in a recent essay that PLA units began to attack US government networks in 2003. Several attacks were traced, Tkacik said, to a network in southern China.
Other Chinese "hackers" were reported to have attacked British computer systems, the US State Department, the Department of Commerce and the US Naval War College.
Richard Halloran is a writer based in Hawaii.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers