For generations, advertising interrupted the entertainment that people in the US wanted to read, hear or watch. Now, in a turnabout, advertising is increasingly being presented as entertainment -- and surprisingly, the idea of all ads, all the time, is gaining some favor.
One reason is the proliferation of broadband Internet connections, which make it easier for computer users to watch or download video clips. That is enabling media companies, agencies and advertisers to create Web sites devoted to commercials and other forms of advertising for amusement, rather than hard-core huckstering.
Oddly, the trend runs counter to another powerful impulse among consumers: The growing desire to avoid advertising. TV viewers, for instance, are spending billions of dollars a year for TiVo and other digital video recorders that help them zip through or zap commercials and click-through rates for banner Web ads are declining.
Michael Jacobs, executive vice president and executive creative director at MRM Worldwide in New York, said that the difference between "watching a commercial on a Web site and in your living room" is that viewing online is "an opt-in audience -- you're choosing to be there."
IT'S ABOUT CHOICE
"It's the nature of the Web to offer a destination you know you can go to and know what you're going to see," said Jacobs, whose agency is part of the McCann Worldgroup division of the Interpublic Group of Companies.
"There's certainly an audience for entertainment as part of the offering," he said. "The numbers seem to support it."
For example, veryfunnyads.com, a broadband Web site operated by the TBS cable network, has delivered more than 63 million video clip views since its introduction last August.
"It's a very straightforward premise: You're going to have a funny experience and you're going to have it every 30 seconds," said Ken Schwab, senior vice president for programming at the TBS and TNT networks, parts of the Turner Broadcasting System division of Time Warner.
Veryfunnyads.com is part of a rebranding campaign for the TBS network, which carries the theme "Very funny." The goal is to cultivate an identity for TBS as a home for sitcoms and humorous movies.
"A lot of people talk about zipping through commercials because the average break doesn't hold the promise of being entertaining," Schwab said.
The concept behind veryfunnyads.com has been expanded onto TBS, Schwab said, as the network will "call out" some commercials as "very funny ads" in hopes of keeping viewers from changing channels.
"I'm in the industry and I'll fast-forward through the ads most of the time," said David Droga, creative chairman at the Droga5 agency in New York. "But I'll stop for the good ones."
"You put choice on the table, you change the whole game," he said.
IT'S ABOUT CONTROL
"Everything is about control," he said. "If an ad is interesting to you, you'll have the conversation with the brand. If it's not, it's a waste of time."
In about a month, Droga plans to test his theory with the trial introduction by Droga5 and its partner, the Publicis Groupe, of a Web site named honeyshed.com.
Droga described the concept as "MTV meets QVC," offering consumers in the intended audience of ages 18 to 30 product information in the form of entertaining video clips rather than traditional commercials.
The clips are to run two to three minutes apiece, he said, and be presented by hosts considered authorities in categories like cars, clothing or computers.
"The only reason we have any chance of being successful is transparency," Droga said. "If people know they're being sold to, you can celebrate the sell."
The USA Network unit of NBC Universal, which is part of General Electric, also intends to climb aboard the pitch wagon celebrating advertising as entertainment with an online effort centered on brand-centric content. Plans call for a Web site next year that would include commercials and movie trailers as well as features like social networking and tools that would let visitors make ads of their own. The site is tentatively named didja.com, as in "Didja see that?"
IT'S ABOUT RELEVANCE
"It's all about relevance," said Chris McCumber, senior vice president for marketing and brand strategy at USA Network. "Consumers want to be entertained on their own time, on their own terms."
"If a spot is not relevant, you're going to want to tune it out," he added. "This will be a platform for consumers to experience their favorite commercials or find out more information about a product."
The proliferation of portals dedicated to advertising as entertainment could mean the trend is already peaking, just as cover articles in magazines about a stock market boom are often followed by plunging indexes.
"I don't think it is so much about putting entertaining commercials on the Web as it is about brands providing immersive experiences for consumers of which entertainment is a component," said Jacobs of MRM, whose agency recently won praise for musical Webisodes for Intel, directed by the humorist Christopher Guest, which are appearing on Web sites like youtube.com and itgetseasier.com.
The responses to a survey this week on the adweek.com web site suggest that advertising as entertainment is still a work in progress.
On Thursday afternoon, 13 percent of respondents agreed the portals were "great fits for the current pop culture," while 43 percent called them "too limited and doomed to fail."
The remaining respondents, 44 percent, agreed with a statement that they are "complete wild cards; let's wait and see."
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers