At the end of a rough dirt track, on a sun-baked hillock once the domain of scorpions and snakes, squats an odd settlement of caravans, generators and drilling rigs that is at the heart of the battle for Iraq's oil.
"Welcome to Texas, Kurdistan," said Karim Ali, as his taxi bounced to the gates of the Taq Taq oilfields on the undulating plains of Koi Sanjaq, some 130km southeast of Irbil.
"Soon we'll all have big hats and cigars like them," he said, nodding at a group of oil workers passing by on a pickup truck.
Like many Iraqis, Karim appeared convinced that the country's vast reserves of crude, the bedrock of its economy, were about to be siphoned off by major US oil corporations. The presence of "foreigners" here at Taq Taq merely cemented his certainty.
With the administration of US President George W. Bush pressing the Iraqi government to pass a new hydrocarbons law, there are widely voiced assumptions that it will bulldoze the oil industry into privatization and that foreign firms -- meaning US ones -- will unfairly reap the rewards. A survey published on Sunday by a group of British and US nongovernmental organizations suggested most Iraqis oppose plans to open the oilfields to foreign investment.
Unlike his compatriots, however, Karim, a Kurd from Sulaimaniya, was not perturbed at the thought.
"They [the Americans] are our friends and they deserve it for getting rid of Saddam [Hussein]," he said. "Besides, when oil was in the hands of Baghdad, it never meant anything other than bombs and bullets for us."
There are no Americans at Taq Taq. The operation is being managed by the Taq Taq Operating Co (TTopco), a joint venture between Genel Energie, a Turkish company, and Addax Petroleum, an independent exploration and development company quoted on the London and Toronto stock exchanges.
The closest thing to a Texan oilman among the 200 or so international team members is Bill, the beefy rig manager, who in his hard hat could pass for John Wayne's Red Adair character in Hellfighters. When not burrowing for oil in Kurdistan, Bill farms sheep in his native Australia.
The Taq Taq field promises to be the most lucrative new oil development in Iraq since the fall of late Iraqi president Saddam Hussein. The three wells sunk since drilling began in May last year have penetrated valuable deposits of high-quality crude oil. Within five years it could be producing as much as 200,000 barrels a day, TTopco general manager Les Blair said.
But the trouble for some in Baghdad is that the contract for the Taq Taq operation is one of several exploration and development projects in the self-rule region that have been negotiated and signed by the Kurdish authorities, independently of central government.
Another more advanced development at Tawke, near the northern Kurdish city of Dohuk, is being run by a Norwegian independent, DNO. The firm recently announced that it was ready to begin exporting the oil it had discovered. It would be the first new field in Iraq to do so since the US invasion in 2003.
The much-delayed hydrocarbons legislation, which was supposed to have gone before the Iraqi parliament before its summer recess, was one of the main US benchmarks for Iraq's ethnic and sectarian communities to heal their divisions.
Likewise, many Iraqis are banking on oil as the nation's best chance to guarantee economic and social stability.
Instead, the protracted negotiations over the law have underlined the deep mistrust between Shiite and Sunni Arabs and Kurds in the national unity government, as well as their mutually contradictory political visions for post-Saddam Iraq.
The struggle for Iraq's oil is not simply the one often depicted: war-weakened Iraqis versus rapacious western oil moguls.
"It is a clash not just of politics but also of investment culture, one that mirrors the broader and crucial debates on Iraq's future," said Bill Farren-Price, deputy editor of Middle East Economic Survey, an oil industry newsletter.
The Kurdistan region's 4 million inhabitants live atop what Ashti Hawarami, natural resources minister in the Kurdistan regional government (KRG), estimates to be at least 25 billion barrels of oil. Hawrami said he wanted the region to produce 1 million barrels a day in five years' time. And to achieve that target, Kurds, who have historically been kept out of the Iraqi oil sector by central governments, must throw open their doors to outside investors, he said.
On Sunday, in a nudge to their counterparts in Baghdad who have taken a summer break, the Kurdish parliament in Irbil passed its own petroleum law. It has also listed 40 exploration blocs in the Kurdistan region it is putting out for tender.
"We do not want to be hobbled by the political paralysis in Baghdad," Hawrami said. "We believe that the production-sharing agreements are the best way to move swiftly forward and help not just the Kurds but all Iraqis."
The operations at Taq Taq and Tawke are based on controversial production-sharing agreements signed with the Kurdistan regional government, under which the private companies get between 10 percent to 20 percent of the profit. The rest goes into government hands.
Such production-sharing agreements are anathema to much of Iraq's oil establishment, as well as to the country's oil unions. The unions, which are strongest in the southern oilfields around Basra, have also rounded on Iraqi Oil Minister Hussein Shahristani, threatening to disrupt production and exports if foreign oil companies are granted too much access to Iraqi oil.
In response, Shahristani has ordered his ministry's agencies and departments not to deal with the unions.
Meanwhile, many Sunni Arabs, who grew accustomed to controlling Iraq's natural resources, oppose a decentralized oil sector, fearing it will entrench their loss of power.
The prospect of the Kurds going it alone on oil has raised concerns among neighboring countries, some of which view the move as an attempt to establish an economic platform for future independence. Kurdish officials dismiss such claims as nonsense and stress they want cooperation with Baghdad and their regional neighbors, not confrontation.
"It will be very difficult for the Kurds, who have little oil experience, to produce and export in the face of opposition from Baghdad and the region," a Western diplomat in Iraq said.
"Baghdad controls the existing pipeline infrastructure, and neighboring Turkey is where Kurdistan's oil would be pumped," he said.
He warned, however, that "it will be very difficult and probably unwise for the oil minister to try to undo the Kurds' achievements on the ground."
In June, Kurdish leaders struck a deal with Baghdad under which all oil revenues would go into a separate fund before being allocated automatically to the federal government and the regions.
The KRG would get 17 percent. But Kurdish officials complain that the revenue-sharing draft has since been unpicked by "chauvinists" in Baghdad.
"One way or the other, the government in Baghdad really wants to see a resumption of a centrally controlled system," Farren-Price said. "But the Kurds are saying the constitution specifically makes it clear that regions should be responsible for bringing in investment and developing new fields."
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past