Bureau of Energy Director-General Yeh Huey-ching (
Of course, people tend to be difficult to pacify when they know that their wallets have gotten thinner as the price of 40 liters of 95 octane gas has gone from NT$1,000 to NT$1,200.
They tend to get cranky when they see that CPC Corp, Taiwan (CPC) has been reaping huge profits and giving its employees generous benefits.
Therefore, as long as the basic nature of CPC doesn't change and its operating expenses remain higher than those of privately run Formosa Petrochemical, people will question every price increase.
This will become an increasingly difficult political problem to handle.
But in fact, a floating price mechanism is the best choice for a liberalized oil industry.
This is because with the high international price of oil, if CPC were to absorb the increased costs, the increase would eventually be paid for out of the state treasury.
This would be tantamount to unfairly forcing poorer citizens who don't use oil to subsidize wealthier people who do.
But the problem is that there are many taxes attached to consumer oil purchases.
Even if CPC turns a large profit, this is in fact a form of tax revenue.
There are thus important tax considerations that must be made when deciding whether or not domestic oil prices should rise in step with international increases.
For example, one liter of 92 octane unleaded gas costs NT$29.1, of which NT$11.14 is tax. If we add in CPC's statutory costs, 40 percent of the NT$29.1 that consumers spend on one liter of 92 octane unleaded gas goes to the government in taxes.
On the surface, it would appear that the purpose of the floating price mechanism is to insulate CPC from losses.
But in fact, its main purpose is to prevent losses in tax revenue. Considering the government's financial difficulties, it appears even less likely that the national treasury would be able to subsidize CPC.
People have heavily criticized the enormous profits CPC has enjoyed ever since the floating price system was implemented.
Their reasoning is very simple. The floating price mechanism bases profit calculations on percentages.
Even though prices go up, CPC still sells the same quantity of oil. But as the unit price increases, its earnings go up as well. If the company's profits remain steady at 6 percent, CPC's total revenue will rise.
For example, in 2003, CPC's total sales from major oil products were about NT$430 billion.
At 6 percent profit, it would have made NT$25.8 billion. CPC is estimated to sell a total of NT$760 billion this year, which would earn it NT$45.6 billion at 6 percent profit.
However, although there is a limit on the oil commodity tax, sales taxes also increase as oil prices rise. For example, when gas is NT$20 per liter, there is around a NT$1 sales tax on each liter. In this case, each year CPC would pay about NT$20 billion in sales tax.
But prices have risen to NT$30 per liter, with a sales tax of NT$1.5 per liter, with the result that CPC will likely have to pay nearly NT$30 billion in sales tax this year.
When the increase in profits is paired with the increase in taxes that come with floating oil prices, we see that they counterbalance one another.
Thus, when the Consumers' Foundation and legislators question floating oil prices, their line of reasoning isn't necessarily accurate.
It is, however, an undisputed fact that floating oil prices substantially benefit the national treasury.
Taiwan depends on imports for nearly all of its crude oil. Compared with other countries that are similarly reliant on imported oil, Taiwan's oil prices are relatively cheap.
However, this isn't because of particularly efficient operations on CPC's part, but because taxes on oil are comparatively low.
Therefore, whether or not oil prices change is not purely an economic question of following market mechanisms.
Rather, it is a political and financial question of subsidies and taxes.
There will be no questions asked about the floating price mechanism if prices drop, but a sustained increase over a number of weeks is enough to set off a political storm.
However, politicians know that speaking of tax increases can hurt their political careers.
Thus, their statement that "the floating oil price mechanism can be reviewed at any time" is in fact the same as declaring that the system will be abandoned -- if it is politically necessary -- in the future.
Jan Shou-jung is a legislative assistant.
Translated by Marc Langer
Could Asia be on the verge of a new wave of nuclear proliferation? A look back at the early history of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which recently celebrated its 75th anniversary, illuminates some reasons for concern in the Indo-Pacific today. US Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin recently described NATO as “the most powerful and successful alliance in history,” but the organization’s early years were not without challenges. At its inception, the signing of the North Atlantic Treaty marked a sea change in American strategic thinking. The United States had been intent on withdrawing from Europe in the years following
My wife and I spent the week in the interior of Taiwan where Shuyuan spent her childhood. In that town there is a street that functions as an open farmer’s market. Walk along that street, as Shuyuan did yesterday, and it is next to impossible to come home empty-handed. Some mangoes that looked vaguely like others we had seen around here ended up on our table. Shuyuan told how she had bought them from a little old farmer woman from the countryside who said the mangoes were from a very old tree she had on her property. The big surprise
The issue of China’s overcapacity has drawn greater global attention recently, with US Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen urging Beijing to address its excess production in key industries during her visit to China last week. Meanwhile in Brussels, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen last week said that Europe must have a tough talk with China on its perceived overcapacity and unfair trade practices. The remarks by Yellen and Von der Leyen come as China’s economy is undergoing a painful transition. Beijing is trying to steer the world’s second-largest economy out of a COVID-19 slump, the property crisis and
Former president Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) trip to China provides a pertinent reminder of why Taiwanese protested so vociferously against attempts to force through the cross-strait service trade agreement in 2014 and why, since Ma’s presidential election win in 2012, they have not voted in another Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) candidate. While the nation narrowly avoided tragedy — the treaty would have put Taiwan on the path toward the demobilization of its democracy, which Courtney Donovan Smith wrote about in the Taipei Times in “With the Sunflower movement Taiwan dodged a bullet” — Ma’s political swansong in China, which included fawning dithyrambs