Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou (
Ma seems to suggest that targeting the seven flawed constitutional amendments since the 1990s. But in reality, they reflect his constant opposition to the path of democratic reform Taiwan has pursued over the past 20 years.
If Ma is elected president and implements his ideas, the sovereignty that are a part of democratic reform will suffer a major blow.
A policy should be judged on its effectiveness, not on superficial elements such as its name or popular appeal.
But many politicians employ lofty slogans meant to inspire dedicated support, even to the point of risking our welfare.
Just like the "third wave of reform" proposed by vice president and KMT presidential candidate Lien Chan (
But the true goal of his reform plans are to overturn past reforms, putting us back to square one.
This is not a personal attack against Ma. A look at Ma's record over his political career shows that he has often opposed key reforms at critical times. Ma was, for example, against the lifting of martial law and direct presidential elections.
A correspondent for the Yomiuri Shimbun in Hong Kong once said: "In all the countries of Asia I have never seen a more eloquent speaker than Ma. We know that he is defending an unreasonable system, but he does it very skillfully."
A US reporter also said it was obvious Ma uses propaganda to cover up key KMT issues, but it would be difficult for the public not to like him because he is so good at listing endless examples and facts that muddle the issues.
When Ma's words are not convincing enough, he makes up for it with his charm, the journalist said, adding that Ma is a great salesman for the KMT.
It's not an exaggeration to see Ma as the KMT's personal makeup artist for covering the blemishes of the Martial Law era.
Ma the beautician has consistently obstructed reforms in recent years.
So why has he suddenly started advocating democratic reforms? Has Ma become a believer, suddenly inspired by democratic values? Or is this a trick to put the KMT back in the presidential office?
Everyone knows the answer. Ma has criticized all seven constitutional reforms over the past 15 years, saying that each was approved just for the sake of exercise, not because they would improve our democracy.
This is why Ma is waiting and observing.
It is true that the past seven amendments have only scratched the surface of problems with the Constitution. But the solution is certainly not to put aside constitutional issues for the first two years of Ma's term if he is elected president.
The solution should be to gain a deeper understanding of why these amendments have been unable to solve the problems facing the country.
The source of the Constitution's main flaws is simple. The Constitution was drawn up with China in mind -- not legislated -- by lawmakers who propagated for a "greater China."
Its core values are not ours and it was written by politicians who did not represent us. The KMT regime fled to Taiwan soon after writing the Constitution. To put it in plain terms: The current Constitution was meant for a different people in a different time.
When the KMT regime was kicked out of China, it ripped its Constitution out by its roots and brought it along to Taiwan with a "greater China" ideology still intact.
Even more tragic is that KMT rulers, after declaring martial law in Taiwan, implemented the Period of National Mobilization for Suppression of the Communist Rebellion, which froze the Constitution along with the rights and election mechanisms enshrined in it.
Taiwan's political mechanisms have sadly not yet been freed of the "greater China" ideology and its authoritarian tradition. To solve Taiwan's constitutional predicament, the real issue is not what part of the Constitution to amend.
A new constitution is necessary, written by Taiwanese for Taiwanese and consistently democratic.
The Constitution is beyond hope. It couldn't be fixed by the past seven amendments and certainly can't be fixed by Ma.
Amendments are tiny changes, temporary patches to win votes rather than part of a long-term strategy to build a Taiwanese constitution.
Translated by Eddy Chang and Lin Ya-ti
Since COVID-19 broke out in Taiwan, there has been a fair amount of news regarding discrimination and “witch hunts” against medical personnel, people under self-quarantine and other targets, such as the students of a school where an infection was discovered. Quarantine breakers are almost certainly on the loose and it is only natural for people to be vigilant. One in Chiayi was found by accident at a traffic stop because his helmet was not fastened. However, those who follow the rules by quarantining themselves should be encouraged to keep up the good work in a difficult situation, instead of being
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator-at-large Wu Sz-huai (吳斯懷) has said that there is a huge difference between Chinese military aircraft circling Taiwan along the edges of its airspace and invading Taiwan’s airspace. He also said that whether it is US or Chinese aircraft flying along or encircling Taiwan’s airspace, there is no legal basis to say that such actions imply a clear provocation of Taiwan, and asked the Ministry of National Defense not to mislead the public. People who hear this might think that it is not a very Taiwanese thing to say. US military activity in the vicinity of Taiwan
As the nation welcomes home Taiwanese who had been stranded in China’s Hubei Province — arguably one of the most dangerous places on Earth since the novel coronavirus outbreak began in its capital, Wuhan, late last year — problems surrounding the “quasi-charter flights” that brought them back have been largely overlooked. The media used the term to describe the two flights dispatched by Taiwan’s state-run China Airlines because they do not count as charter flights. Taiwanese wanting to board those flights had to travel — most likely by train — more than 1,000km from Hubei to Shanghai Pudong International Airport
As the COVID-19 pandemic spins out of control, many parts of the world are experiencing shortages of medical masks and other protective equipment. I am studying in Washington state, which at the time of writing is the US state that has suffered the largest number of deaths from the novel coronavirus. The week before last, UW Medicine — an organization that includes the University of Washington School of Medicine and associated medical centers and clinics — sent its volunteers an e-mail asking the public to make masks and donate them to hospitals. Attached to the message was a mask donation