Environmentalists in Myanmar have expressed their shock at seeing mountains of logs being transported on trucks across the border into China despite efforts to halt the trade to save the country's forests from total destruction.
"I was shocked to see mountains of logs and big timber trucks" heading from Laiza into China, the spokeswoman for one local environment group, the Pan Kachin Development Society said.
On condition that she not be named, she said she had counted up to 80 trucks crossing the border each day during a visit to the town in April.
Stacks of teak, tamalan and other woods lined the roads waiting to go, she said.
"It seems they have set up sawmills in the forest and chopped the trees to be easier to carry," she said. "Some logs were only about one-and-a-half feet [0.45m] in circumference," although China usually wants trees nearly twice that size.
"That means that people even cut small trees because there are no more big trees left," she said.
The trade endures despite China's efforts to stop it because of a complex mix of interests.
For Myanmar's junta, timber is one of its major sources of desperately needed foreign currency.
MyanmarTwo main ethnic Kachin groups who have partial control over the region also see the timber trade as a key source of income and have shown varying degrees of willingness to stop it.
LAX ENFORCEMENT
Local Chinese authorities along the border have not consistently enforced the year-old ban, creating pockets where timber still flows across the border.
Laiza, a village about 1,000km north of Yangon, is the base for the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), one of 17 armed ethnic groups to have signed ceasefires with Myanmar's military junta.
After the KIO signed its ceasefire in 1993, the group received a degree of autonomy in their part of Kachin State, a region sandwiched between China and India that is home to virgin forests as well as jade, gold and other mineral reserves.
Laiza quickly turned into a significant trading town, especially for timber which once flowed freely across the border about 16km away to feed China's insatiable appetite for raw materials.
HUGE APPETITE
Some 1.5 million cubic meters of timber worth US$350 million was exported from Myanmar to China in 2005, most of it illegal, according to Britain-based forestry watchdog Global Witness.
That was a 12 percent gain over the amount of timber shipped to China the year before, and roughly double the amount exported in 2000, Global Witness said.
China, which has imposed stiff limits on logging in its own forests amid fears of deforestation, uses the wood to supply its construction boom and its soaring exports of wooden furniture.
But in the face of international pressure that followed the Global Witness report, China decided a year ago to officially close its borders to Myanmar's timber.
Global Witness said one of its teams spent a couple of weeks on the border in April, and they believed the ban has had a major effect on the Chinese side, although some problems remain.
"What we are seeing from the Chinese side is there has been a ban in all areas along the border, no question about it," said Mike Davis, Global Witness team leader for the Southeast Asia forest campaign.
With scant data from Myanmar's government, environmental groups analyze Chinese import and logging data to estimate the size of the trade, but no precise data has been made available since the ban took effect last year.
But to illustrate the ban's overall effectiveness, Davis pointed to the town of Pianma, a major border timber town.
Migrant workers flocked to the city a decade ago when the illegal trade turned it into a boom town, driving its population from 3,000 to about 40,000.
Since last year, Davis said the town was down to 10,000 people as migrant workers found the logging business drying up.
"That said, there is stuff still coming across in various places, and in some places at times in quite large volume," he said.
"We are concerned, I think these types of activity are on the increase," he said.
SUPPORT UNDERMINED
At the government level China appeared to be genuinely working at shutting down the illicit trade, Davis said, but he added that those efforts had been hampered by Chinese companies fiddling with their quotas or hunting for loopholes in the ban.
Some of the trade is just plain smuggling, he said.
"Chinese businesses involved in the trade are increasingly choosing to buy pieces of forested land within Kachin State in order to clear-fell all tree cover," Davis said.
"This is a particularly destructive approach to logging that causes huge environmental damage," he said.
Clear-cutting in Myanmar's interior also makes it difficult to estimate the extent of the deforestation because outsiders have so little access to the area.
But Global Witness says huge swathes of land along the border have been logged.
One former military man who was involved in the trade in Myanmar said that logging was still possible if big enough bribes were paid to local police, forestry officials, military personnel and local militia groups.
"If we got a logging permit for 10 tonnes from an official, we would cut at least 30 tonnes of trees just from that permit paper," the former military source said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
BRIBERY
He said he had left the armed services after the pro-democracy uprising in 1988, and like many other former soldiers ended up taking a job in logging where he used his military connections to facilitate the passing of bribes from companies to the government.
He believes his company made a lot of money, but says that wealth didn't trickle down. He finally quit the business in 2000 because he was fed up with the corrupt system.
Sometimes, he said, he had received permits to log in areas that had already been clearcut.
"What we did then, we'd just find a place where there were still trees and cut them down," he said.
Despite the concern about the future of the Myanmar forests, Davis said he believes the Chinese authorities had managed to significantly curb the trade, in part because they wanted to avoid negative publicity ahead of next year's Beijing Olympics.
"We think that although the restrictions that the Chinese imposed are not an end solution in themselves, they are an encouraging start," he said.
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers
Gogoro Inc was once a rising star and a would-be unicorn in the years prior to its debut on the NASDAQ in 2022, as its environmentally friendly technology and stylish design attracted local young people. The electric scooter and battery swapping services provider is bracing for a major personnel shakeup following the abrupt resignation on Friday of founding chairman Horace Luke (陸學森) as chief executive officer. Luke’s departure indicates that Gogoro is sinking into the trough of unicorn disillusionment, with the company grappling with poor financial performance amid a slowdown in demand at home and setbacks in overseas expansions. About 95