This year's G8 summit in Germany was unusual in that, a month later, people are still talking about whether or not it achieved anything. But one breakthrough at the summit is undeniable: the new statistic of extinction rates appeared on the agenda.
For the first time, the leaders of the world's most powerful nations took notice of a constituency that they have largely ignored -- the wild animals, fish, and plants that make up all the millions of living species on the planet besides humans.
Scientists predict that at least a third and as much as two-thirds of the world's species could be on their way to extinction by the end of this century, mostly because people are destroying tropical forests and other habitats, over-fishing the oceans and changing the global climate.
The world's wealthiest countries endorsed the idea of an international study to examine the economic benefits of conserving wildlife. While this is a good first step, but there is much left to do.
Wild species of bats, birds, and amphibians add several billion dollars each year to the world's agricultural economy by controlling pests and pollinating major crops -- a free service that they get little credit for providing. Coral reefs, 27 percent of which have already disappeared, sustain marine resources that add US$375 billion to the global economy each year.
Likewise, more than a quarter of all medicinal drugs, representing billions of dollars in sales and reduced healthcare costs, possess active ingredients derived from wild species. And when natural forest habitat is cleared, the hardened soils left behind allow pooled water to breed mosquitoes that have increased the number of worldwide deaths from malaria.
Economists already understand that for more than a billion of the world's poorest people, income does not come from any bank or government program, but from the intricate tapestry of forests, oceans, and wildlife that surrounds them. Yet many of the poorest people live on degraded landscapes, deforested and eroded soils and over-fished coastlines where conservation is vital to lifting them out of poverty.
As a result, conservation is as much a human rights issue as an environmental one. The new study endorsed by the G8 heads of state will certainly direct welcome new attention to this fact. But, given that many scientists believe that we have only a couple of decades left to protect the world's remaining natural habitats, it is imperative that concrete and urgent steps to protect wildlife be taken now.
In addition to bringing global warming under control by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, we must build a much larger and more sophisticated global conservation reserve system that encompasses the most wildlife-rich land and marine areas.
Existing reserves in areas with the highest concentrations of species, which lie mostly in developing countries, need to be extended and linked through corridors. This will enable wildlife to move into new environments, escape habitat destruction and adapt to climate changes.
At the same time, people living in or near such reserves must be given the assistance they need to farm, fish, and earn a livelihood in ways that do not destroy the very ecosystems on which they and wildlife depend.
We already know how to do this. It just costs more than we have been willing to spend. The wealthy G8 nations -- which alone can afford to invest in such an ambitious worldwide project -- together spend several hundred million dollars a year on global conservation activities. Conservation experts say that the annual investment will eventually need to be close to US$6 billion -- roughly what the world spends every year on potato chips.
Eventually, a worldwide carbon trading system could generate much of the money needed to finance a global conservation network. This would offer the double benefit of capturing greenhouse gas pollution and saving the world's wildlife from oblivion. Until then, the world's richest countries are the only ones that can begin pulling together the seed money to get the effort started.
Next year's G8 meeting in Japan must go beyond studying the problem to making a significant down payment on solving it.
Rich or poor, industrial or rural, we are all connected to the world's diversity of life. The oceans, forests, grasslands and all the places called home by the millions of other species sharing our planet are a part of our lives too. It is time we recognized that and demanded that our leaders work to create a sustainable future for ourselves and a legacy that our children will admire.
Philippe Cousteau is president of Earth Echo International. Philip Clapp is president of the National Environmental Trust in Washington. Copyright: Project Syndicate
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers