The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) congress recently passed a proposal on holding a referendum on opening direct cross-strait flights.
At the same time, it has passed amendments to the party charter, adding the phrase "prioritize Taiwan and benefit the people" to its second clause.
KMT Legislator John Chiang (
It is true that cross-strait trade and other exchanges have increased over the past decade. But there is another story behind this reality -- the crisis of losing industries to China and the use of commerce to control the political situation.
People who identify themselves as Taiwanese are very worried about this and are on their guard to avoid winding up on the road to annexation.
People who support the KMT consider this trend in cross-strait relations a matter of course, believing that stable cross-strait relations are necessary for stable relations with the rest of the international community. Such people argue that the problems in foreign relations are a result of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) government provoking China.
They even argue that the government's attempts to become a member of the WHO under the name Taiwan is wrong.
As the argument goes, applying to the WHO as Taiwan endangers the nation's relations with the 20-odd countries that recognize the Republic of China (ROC).
Although Costa Rica recently broke off diplomatic ties with Taiwan, that was mostly because of the money Beijing offered it to do so. There is no connection with President Chen Shui-bian's (
As to those 20-odd diplomatic allies of the ROC, if someone were forcing them to recognize the ROC as the government of China, that would be a different story. Why should these countries face a choice between recognizing China or Taiwan?
Unfortunately, establishing relations with either China or Taiwan means having to break off relations with the other.
No progress has been made since the time when the UN General Assembly "solved" the issue of who had the right to represent China and Chiang Kai-shek (
At that time, the US planned for representation by two Chinas or by one China and one Taiwan. Chiang insisted that "gentlemen won't stand together with thieves" and pulled Taiwan out of the UN, creating the either-or dilemma. Chiang's action hurt the Taiwanese and the KMT itself.
Because of his actions, it is international practice to consider the ROC as China -- either as a separate "China" or a province of the People's Republic of China.
This is what is impeding Taiwan's independence and Taiwanese know very well that the nation cannot make any progress under the name "Republic of China."
The KMT, however, is desperately holding on to its Republic of China ideology. Advocating this position can only lead to prioritizing China and disadvantaging Taiwanese.
Chen Yi-shen is associate researcher at the Academia Sinica's Institute of Modern History.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US