In the past, the police frequently solved cases almost like a surgeon conducting an operation: After a crime was reported, the police would actively investigate the leads and round up suspects so that they could be handed over to prosecutors.
But in recent years, the police are acting more like a health care institution, cooperating with citizens to find the root causes of crime and trying to solve the problem where it originated.
The kind of crime prevention policy is what academics in the police world call "community-oriented policing."
Community-oriented policing can be traced back to the US in the 1980s. At that time, the thinking of police experts guided US law enforcement agencies toward an emphasis on mobile patrols and rapid reaction as well as crime investigation. But criminologists soon discovered that relying on police expertise alone was insufficient to effectively bring down crime rates.
As a result, attention turned too how police could work with social institutions, including families, schools, churches and business associations, to build a safer community together.
The concept of community-oriented policing redefined the roll of the police force and transformed it from a crime-fighting warrior into a solver of community problems.
In the US, many police departments that used the community-oriented policing model made revolutionary changes in the structure of the police force in order to find a better solution to social problems. Front-line police officers gained greater authority to solve social problems a major departure from the military-like chain-of-command power structure that had been maintained in the past.
Furthermore, since community-oriented policing requirements were different from the traditional pattern of specialization, many police departments adjusted the way officers were recruited, trained, rewarded and promoted.
These revolutionary changes brought by community-oriented policing also transformed the fundamental nature of police culture and demonstrated that a new era of policing had arrived.
Taiwan long ago began working toward implementing community-oriented policing and integrating this system more fully into the community. Results in the different communities where the policy has been implemented have varied, but if community-oriented policing is to truly succeed, it must be melded with the idea of problem-oriented policing may realize the philosophy behind community-oriented policing.
These two ideas are different but complementary, because the strategies of problem-oriented policing may realize the philosophy behind community-oriented policing.
Traditionally, people expect the police to quickly arrive at a crime scene but ignore that it is what officers do after arriving there that tracks down the cause of the crime.
We should therefore change our approach and help the police identify the causes of crime, enabling them to solve a bigger problem.
Solving problems is certainly nothing new for police departments, and helping citizens solve their problems is a daily task. But with community-oriented policing, the front-line officers must cooperate more with the community and actively participate in solving social problems.
More importantly, the relevant government units must also come into the mechanism of community-oriented policing and provide the support needed to solve social problems.
Wang Hsiao-Ming is a visiting professor at the Central Police University's department of police administration.
TRANSLATED BY JASON COX
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
As Maldivian President Mohamed Muizzu’s party won by a landslide in Sunday’s parliamentary election, it is a good time to take another look at recent developments in the Maldivian foreign policy. While Muizzu has been promoting his “Maldives First” policy, the agenda seems to have lost sight of a number of factors. Contemporary Maldivian policy serves as a stark illustration of how a blend of missteps in public posturing, populist agendas and inattentive leadership can lead to diplomatic setbacks and damage a country’s long-term foreign policy priorities. Over the past few months, Maldivian foreign policy has entangled itself in playing
A group of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers led by the party’s legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (?) are to visit Beijing for four days this week, but some have questioned the timing and purpose of the visit, which demonstrates the KMT caucus’ increasing arrogance. Fu on Wednesday last week confirmed that following an invitation by Beijing, he would lead a group of lawmakers to China from Thursday to Sunday to discuss tourism and agricultural exports, but he refused to say whether they would meet with Chinese officials. That the visit is taking place during the legislative session and in the aftermath