Last Thursday, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
However, Wang's rejection of a Ma-Wang ticket was just what Ma wanted.
In other words, since Ma did not invite Wang to team up with him at the outset, he must not have respected Wang that much.
Indeed, if Ma truly respected Wang, Ma's camp would not have accused Wang of corruption.
Not long ago, Ma's support ratings were still sky high and his choice of running mate was not supposed to be an issue.
The problem was that Wang became somebody that Ma, after he was indicted for corruption, could no longer afford to ignore .
The more interesting issue is why Wang rejected being Ma's running mate.
As Wang cannot become the most powerful person within the KMT -- that honor belongs to Ma, regardless of whether he is the party's chairman or not -- Wang's position as legislative speaker is as high as he can go.
Since he failed to become party chairman or a presidential candidate, serving as the vice presidential candidate would seem to be the best choice for Wang to further his political career.
From this point of view, Wang should have been begging Ma and the KMT to let him run as vice president.
So why was it the other way around?
Perhaps Wang was invited simply because he is particularly adept at political maneuvering, or because he can attract moderate voters, or because he is influential in the legislature, or because he is considered part of the pro-localization faction inside the KMT.
But if all these things are true, why did Ma attack him so viciously in the KMT chairmanship election?
Wang, who has spent a lifetime in politics, undoubtedly understood the situation.
He knew that all he had to do was say "yes" and the vice presidential candidacy would have been his.
Although he would have been serving under Ma, this would have been a boost to his political career.
In a meeting with Ma, Wang brought up the party's various difficulties, including its position on localization, its controversial stolen assets, corruption and position on Taiwanese sovereignty.
But all of these are the legacy of the KMT's past as a party-state and not new issues.
The fact is that Wang decided not to team up with Ma regardless of the negative impact on his career or the party.
Wang insisted on not teaming up with Ma because he knows that Ma only has a slim chance of winning the presidential election.
Pan-blue camp media reported during Wang's visit to former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Wang replied: "Since you know that winning will be difficult, why have you asked me to team up with him?"
Today, Ma's front-runner status is weakening and Wang, rather than going down with Ma's ship, is stepping back to watch.
Although Wang rejected a vice presidential bid, he stressed that his cooperation with Ma would continue unchanged.
However, such a pledge has a double meaning. First, it indicates that Wang will not run for the presidency as an independent candidate.
Although he would stand little chance of winning as an independent, he could affect the outcome of the election.
Thus, his promise not to run was designed to soothe KMT election anxieties.
Second, Wang pledged to continue cooperating to give himself room to maneuver so that the KMT couldn't pin Ma's failure to win the election on him.
Wang's ambiguous attitude toward Ma has made Ma lose face and made Wang the object of dark-blue hatred.
Now that the Ma-Wang ticket is no more, the pan-blue camp will very likely attack Wang.
KMT Secretary-General Wu Den-yih (
It is thus evident that internal power struggles have begun within the KMT.
The KMT's problem is that the public's faith in Ma has been weakened.
Some consider Ma to be even worse than Lien, who is often compared to A-dou (
In truth, it is Ma who is worse than A-dou.
When Lien and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
However, an opinion poll conducted by the pro-Ma China Times showed that Ma's support ratings dropped to 32 percent after Wang refused to be his running mate.
In this light, Wang's decision is already proving to be a wise one.
As the Chinese saying goes, "God destroys those who don't help themselves."
By refusing to run with Ma, a shrewd politician like Wang could only have been trying to help himself.
Chin Heng-wei is the editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers