Last Thursday, Legislative Speaker Wang Jin-pyng (
However, Wang's rejection of a Ma-Wang ticket was just what Ma wanted.
In other words, since Ma did not invite Wang to team up with him at the outset, he must not have respected Wang that much.
Indeed, if Ma truly respected Wang, Ma's camp would not have accused Wang of corruption.
Not long ago, Ma's support ratings were still sky high and his choice of running mate was not supposed to be an issue.
The problem was that Wang became somebody that Ma, after he was indicted for corruption, could no longer afford to ignore .
The more interesting issue is why Wang rejected being Ma's running mate.
As Wang cannot become the most powerful person within the KMT -- that honor belongs to Ma, regardless of whether he is the party's chairman or not -- Wang's position as legislative speaker is as high as he can go.
Since he failed to become party chairman or a presidential candidate, serving as the vice presidential candidate would seem to be the best choice for Wang to further his political career.
From this point of view, Wang should have been begging Ma and the KMT to let him run as vice president.
So why was it the other way around?
Perhaps Wang was invited simply because he is particularly adept at political maneuvering, or because he can attract moderate voters, or because he is influential in the legislature, or because he is considered part of the pro-localization faction inside the KMT.
But if all these things are true, why did Ma attack him so viciously in the KMT chairmanship election?
Wang, who has spent a lifetime in politics, undoubtedly understood the situation.
He knew that all he had to do was say "yes" and the vice presidential candidacy would have been his.
Although he would have been serving under Ma, this would have been a boost to his political career.
In a meeting with Ma, Wang brought up the party's various difficulties, including its position on localization, its controversial stolen assets, corruption and position on Taiwanese sovereignty.
But all of these are the legacy of the KMT's past as a party-state and not new issues.
The fact is that Wang decided not to team up with Ma regardless of the negative impact on his career or the party.
Wang insisted on not teaming up with Ma because he knows that Ma only has a slim chance of winning the presidential election.
Pan-blue camp media reported during Wang's visit to former KMT chairman Lien Chan (
Wang replied: "Since you know that winning will be difficult, why have you asked me to team up with him?"
Today, Ma's front-runner status is weakening and Wang, rather than going down with Ma's ship, is stepping back to watch.
Although Wang rejected a vice presidential bid, he stressed that his cooperation with Ma would continue unchanged.
However, such a pledge has a double meaning. First, it indicates that Wang will not run for the presidency as an independent candidate.
Although he would stand little chance of winning as an independent, he could affect the outcome of the election.
Thus, his promise not to run was designed to soothe KMT election anxieties.
Second, Wang pledged to continue cooperating to give himself room to maneuver so that the KMT couldn't pin Ma's failure to win the election on him.
Wang's ambiguous attitude toward Ma has made Ma lose face and made Wang the object of dark-blue hatred.
Now that the Ma-Wang ticket is no more, the pan-blue camp will very likely attack Wang.
KMT Secretary-General Wu Den-yih (
It is thus evident that internal power struggles have begun within the KMT.
The KMT's problem is that the public's faith in Ma has been weakened.
Some consider Ma to be even worse than Lien, who is often compared to A-dou (
In truth, it is Ma who is worse than A-dou.
When Lien and People First Party (PFP) Chairman James Soong (
However, an opinion poll conducted by the pro-Ma China Times showed that Ma's support ratings dropped to 32 percent after Wang refused to be his running mate.
In this light, Wang's decision is already proving to be a wise one.
As the Chinese saying goes, "God destroys those who don't help themselves."
By refusing to run with Ma, a shrewd politician like Wang could only have been trying to help himself.
Chin Heng-wei is the editor-in-chief of Contemporary Monthly magazine.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US