After several years of lobbying, on May 30 the legislature agreed to extend the maximum allowable stay for foreign laborers to nine years from the previous maximum of six years. The new limit, pending approval in the legislature, will apply to all blue-collar and domestic workers.
During the deliberations, however, Council of Labor Affairs (CLA) representatives adopted a conservative view on the extension, with CLA Deputy Chairwoman Tsao Ai-lan (曹愛蘭) citing the situation in Germany, where "guest workers," she said, had developed into a poorly integrated immigrant population. Taiwan, she said, should avoid allowing migrant workers to bring their families and settle in the country.
Germany's failure to prevent migrants from becoming immigrants was seen as a mistake by Taiwanese policymakers -- hence the promotion of a rigid control policy on immigrants.
In the past century, not only Germany but most West European countries recruited guest workers to fuel the postwar economic boom. Such migration systems share similarities with indentured labor, as a continuation of the historical processes that began in the 15th century with European colonial expansion.
The 1955 German guest-worker program was designed to plug the country's labor shortage, satisfy Germany's demand for cheaper labor and prevent labor-intensive companies from moving to low-wage countries.
A ban on labor recruitment began in 1973, but millions of guest workers remained. Family reunification and humanitarian considerations added to Germany's growing immigrant population.
Family reunions often result in family members seeking permanent residence in Germany, a phenomenon that is compounded by a few things.
First, family reunification is mentioned in international conventions. In 1950, the European Convention on Human Rights addressed "the right of migrant workers and their families to protection and assistance."
Second, after the 1960s, different groups within German society also requested that the state facilitate family reunions. Employers believed workers would only settle properly if they could stay with their family and were also in favor of recruiting a worker's spouse.
In Italy, Catholic communities were convinced that family separation would destroy family values of and lead individuals to a life of crime.
German authorities, for their part, feared that their country's image could suffer if the country appeared to act inhumanely.
President of the Federal Institute for Job Placement and Unemployment Insurance Neue Rhein Zeitung said in 1964 that people had to realize that the employment of foreigners was not merely an economic question and that the separation of families was unacceptable. Consequently, immigration challenged Germany's policies on citizenship and social integration.
Since then, most Western European countries have faced similar challenges: Guest workers have become permanent settlers and integration has become a major policy concern. Even Germany, which has held onto its policy on temporary migration, has gradually moved toward recognition of settlement policies.
Germany's mistake, therefore, was not a failure in immigration control. Rather, it was to believe that it could turn flows of migrant workers on and off as if with a tap and ignore universal human rights, the migratory process itself and the influence of international institutions.
Through interaction between employers and social groups, international institutions and local societies, laws and policies to protect the rights of migrant workers were promulgated. The premise was that migrants rights could not be sacrificed in the name of economic efficiency.
It is no mean feat to reconcile guest-worker policies with the prevailing market principles, not to mention democratic norms.
In addressing the vulnerabilities of migrants, there is a need for a complex protection system consisting of international and national laws.
The Taiwanese government, to its merit, has said it will abide by international humanitarian principles.
A lack of international influence and exchanges, however, has hampered Taiwan's effort to achieve this objective. As a result, the oppression and exploitation of temporary migrant workers has accompanied a widespread view that migrant workers are unworthy of citizenship and therefore cannot enter the immigration stream.
Taiwanese employers and non-governmental organizations have been lobbying for longer possible working periods for migrant workers, but rarely will the issue of family reunion be raised. Moreover, some have looked at these policies with apprehension, fearing that more rights and long-term employment for migrant workers could lead to more mobility.
Allowing for a stable labor force that benefits employers but fails to address family reunification is inhuman.
It is therefore incumbent on Taiwan to rethink its position on migrant workers and their families.
Yu-Chien Lorna Kung is general secretary of the Scalabrini International Migration Network.
Saudi Arabian largesse is flooding Egypt’s cultural scene, but the reception is mixed. Some welcome new “cooperation” between two regional powerhouses, while others fear a hostile takeover by Riyadh. In Cairo, historically the cultural capital of the Arab world, Egyptian Minister of Culture Nevine al-Kilany recently hosted Saudi Arabian General Entertainment Authority chairman Turki al-Sheikh. The deep-pocketed al-Sheikh has emerged as a Medici-like patron for Egypt’s cultural elite, courted by Cairo’s top talent to produce a slew of forthcoming films. A new three-way agreement between al-Sheikh, Kilany and United Media Services — a multi-media conglomerate linked to state intelligence that owns much of
The US and other countries should take concrete steps to confront the threats from Beijing to avoid war, US Representative Mario Diaz-Balart said in an interview with Voice of America on March 13. The US should use “every diplomatic economic tool at our disposal to treat China as what it is... to avoid war,” Diaz-Balart said. Giving an example of what the US could do, he said that it has to be more aggressive in its military sales to Taiwan. Actions by cross-party US lawmakers in the past few years such as meeting with Taiwanese officials in Washington and Taipei, and
The Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan has no official diplomatic allies in the EU. With the exception of the Vatican, it has no official allies in Europe at all. This does not prevent the ROC — Taiwan — from having close relations with EU member states and other European countries. The exact nature of the relationship does bear revisiting, if only to clarify what is a very complicated and sensitive idea, the details of which leave considerable room for misunderstanding, misrepresentation and disagreement. Only this week, President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) received members of the European Parliament’s Delegation for Relations
Denmark’s “one China” policy more and more resembles Beijing’s “one China” principle. At least, this is how things appear. In recent interactions with the Danish state, such as applying for residency permits, a Taiwanese’s nationality would be listed as “China.” That designation occurs for a Taiwanese student coming to Denmark or a Danish citizen arriving in Denmark with, for example, their Taiwanese partner. Details of this were published on Sunday in an article in the Danish daily Berlingske written by Alexander Sjoberg and Tobias Reinwald. The pretext for this new practice is that Denmark does not recognize Taiwan as a state under