It almost seems like May was "Hatta Yoichi month." There was no end to the articles and activities commemorating him.
Starting in 1920, Hatta Yoichi spent 10 years building the Wushantou Reservoir (烏山頭水庫) and the Chianan Irrigation Canal (嘉南大圳). The reservoir has a capacity of 5.5 billion cubic meters and the catchment area stretches for more than 90km, while the irrigation canals are more than 1,000km long, providing water to 145,500 hectares of farmland in Chiayi, Tainan and nearby areas.
Before the construction of the canal, farmers were dependent on the weather for their farming, but that soon changed and the area has become the granary of Taiwan.
To this day, Hatta is admired for his great contribution. From the point of view of organic agriculture, he is even more relevant for the future of Taiwan.
Organic agriculture is useful in protecting the environment, advancing farming methods and providing health benefits for the consumer. For this reason, Europe has been strongly encouraging organic agriculture in the last few years; in Austria, organic farms already constitute more than 15 percent of farmland.
Although organic farming has been promoted in Taiwan for some years, progress has been limited: Organic farms constitute just 0.1 percent of the nation's farmland.
One reason might be that industrial pollution along the west coast makes it difficult to find land for organic fields. The early promotion of organic products placed too much emphasis on just the absence of pesticides. This misunderstanding was not cleared up right away, and is now hard to dismiss.
The Council of Agriculture recently announced that it was planning to set the maximum allowed concentration of pesticides in organic products at 5 percent of the safety limit for conventionally grown produce. This sparked a lot of criticism, and even members of the Consumers' Foundation misunderstand the essence of organic farming.
Organic agriculture involves a way of farming based on ecological principles, without using chemical fertilizers or pesticides, but that does not mean that if a small level of pesticides is found, the product is no longer organic. Neither Europe, the US nor Japan make such harsh presumptions. If the rule that no pesticides can be used is carried out strictly, then a small amount of unintentional pollution can make farmers lose confidence, and organic farming would be difficult to implement.
Of course, to make it possible for organic farming to be carried out normally, the farmland first has to be cleaned up. The Chianan Irrigation Canal can be used for exactly this purpose.
If the Wushantou Reservoir and the Chianan Irrigation Canal can be kept clean, they can be very useful for the cleaning of farmland. If organic farming is encouraged for all farmland close to the canal, then the irrigation water that the neighboring fields receive will be clean, which is better for organic farming. If this method is used close to the canal and then further away, and expanded to one field after another, perhaps the Chianan plains can slowly reclaim lost land.
This is what Hatta's contribution can mean in the modern era.
Of course there are also other reasons organic farming is hard to promote, but if we don't make more of an effort and stop farmland from becoming more and more polluted, the nation will be unable to produce safe, high-quality agricultural products.
We could then forget about selling our agricultural products on the international market.
Warren Kuo is a professor at National Taiwan University's Department of Agronomy.
Translated by Anna Stiggelbout
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS