After ruling Taiwan for decades, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) is finally considering amending its charter to reflect a shift toward Taiwan-centered consciousness. This is a step in the KMT's democratic transformation. However, it has also encountered strong resistance from the party's conservative elements, highlighting the fact that this nearly century-old party still carries a lot of historical baggage.
The KMT has had so many difficulties standing in the way of internal reform that even a 10-year chairmanship under a strong democratic proponent like former president Lee Teng-hui (
Despite what the KMT old guard might think, dictator Chiang Kai-shek (
With next year's presidential election approaching, the KMT is facing yet another chance to win back the government it lost more than seven years ago. To boost its presidential candidate Ma Ying-jeou's (
The reform of the party charter, however, does not mean wholesale change is to be expected. If the KMT really wants to win the hearts of the public, it must focus on Taiwan. It must also strive to make the will of Taiwanese people the will of the party, and the party's interests must be made to coincide with the interests of Taiwan. This is the only way for the KMT to compete with the DPP and for Taiwanese democracy to continue to develop.
Some KMT hardliners are concerned that amending the party charter would alienate their core supporters. The fact is the party is only trying to water down its unification stance to avoid polarizing debates on unification or independence. Focusing on the DPP government's achievements, or lack thereof, would be a more effective strategy. Besides, recent political changes and elections around the world show that parties are moving toward the center and that ideologies are becoming blurred in the bid to lure voter support.
Regardless of whether it is to promote the party's future development, improve its chances in next year's presidential election, for democratic reasons, or for the sake of Taiwan, the change is a small but welcome development.
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
The past few months have seen tremendous strides in India’s journey to develop a vibrant semiconductor and electronics ecosystem. The nation’s established prowess in information technology (IT) has earned it much-needed revenue and prestige across the globe. Now, through the convergence of engineering talent, supportive government policies, an expanding market and technologically adaptive entrepreneurship, India is striving to become part of global electronics and semiconductor supply chains. Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s Vision of “Make in India” and “Design in India” has been the guiding force behind the government’s incentive schemes that span skilling, design, fabrication, assembly, testing and packaging, and
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.