The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has indicated it is now considering joining forces with the People First Party (PFP) to launch a no-confidence vote against newly sworn-in Premier Chang Chun-hsiung (
According to KMT Secretary-General Wu Den-yih (
Hopefully Wu was not bluffing. But if it turns out that both the KMT and the PFP are bluffing, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) -- given the absurdity in the legislature -- should seriously consider launching its own campaign to topple the premier.
While it may appear bizarre at first glance to have the governing party launch a no-confidence vote to oust its own premier, such an approach might be necessary in order to put the madness that is the current Legislative Yuan to rest.
If a no-confidence vote passes, the president has the authority to dismiss the legislature. A new legislative election would then be called, offering an opportunity for all the political parties -- especially incumbent legislators -- to face public scrutiny.
Forget about the country's well-being. Looking at the opposition-controlled legislative agenda for tomorrow shows just how much the 2008 presidential elections and Ma Ying-jeou's (
According to Friday's schedule, the KMT-proposed amendment to the Organic Law of the National Communications Commission (
The amendment states that all special allowances claimed by officials before the end of last year should be seen as "substantial subsidies."
Passage of the amendment would decriminalize the behavior that led to Ma's indictment on corruption charges after he allegedly wired half of his monthly special allowance fund directly into a personal account during his stint as Taipei mayor from 1998 to last year.
Unsurprisingly, the bill to amend the Organic Law of the Central Election Commission (
Given the repeated brawls that have broken out while the DPP has tried to block a vote on the KMT-proposed CEC bill -- which would give the pan-blue camp a majority in the commission if passed -- chances of the government budget being reviewed in Friday's session look slim.
The Budget Act stipulates that the legislature finish its review of budget requests at least one month before the end of its fiscal year. Now June is a week away and a budget review is still in limbo. Shame on the legislature.
The pan-blue camp is also proposing amendments to the Farmers' Association Law (
How long can the public allow this absurdity to go on, allowing the pan-blue camp to exploit their majority in the legislature not for the sake of the country but for their own selfish interests?
Go ahead and launch a no-confidence vote on the premier. Let the president dismiss the legislature. Let the legislators look even more foolish than they do already. Let them face the public.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past