The National Communications Commission (NCC) held the first public hearing in the second round of digital terrestrial TV licensing on Wednesday last week to discuss allocating the largest amount of TV resources in the nation's history.
Oddly, the mass media showed very little interest. Why? Maybe they do not value public issues. But more likely, this lack of interest may be the result of the commission's irresponsibility.
The commission only provided technical information and failed to explain to the public that this allocation of frequencies could help prevent further erosion of TV programming quality.
The commission said the technology is mature and the era of high-definition television (HDTV) is just around the corner. As the 2008 Beijing Olympic Games will be broadcast on HDTV, the commission and business operators hope that licenses will be issued as soon as possible.
Commercial products are often promoted with the help of major events. For example, in 1959, TV sales were extremely good in Japan, because the Japanese public wanted to watch the royal wedding that year.
Still, not all the Olympic events will be broadcast on HDTV and some HDTV broadcasts can be watched on conventional TV sets. Given these circumstances, how many Taiwanese will purchase the expensive HDTV sets just to watch the Olympic Games? The commission has not provided any statistics.
The commission tosses around slogans -- digital convergence, audio-video interaction, international trends and viewer rights -- that seem designed to turn terrestrial TV into an effective competitor to the cable TV business that dominates the market.
This is an ambitious goal and its success is anything but certain. There are problems, including the low penetration rate of digital TV sets. A generous allotment of public frequencies cannot, on its own, solve that.
Furthermore, the commission apparently has not analyzed why, after three years in operation, the existing 15 digital wireless channels still cannot compete with cable TV. Nor has it considered why the latest distribution would change the fate of digital TV. What conditions have to be met to alleviate their predicament?
As private cable broadcasting systems dominate the market, should the wireless broadcasting platform be public or private to compete effectively? Should the cable networks be required to carry these channels on fixed frequencies, with allotted terrestrial frequencies and accompanying cable TV licenses? What complementary measures will benefit the systems rather than cause conflict? What concerns and market management analyses did the commission conduct before making its policy?
Theoretically, the commission should have carried out a complete survey and evaluation of the TV market when judging possible future market developments and policy responses. However, the commission seemed to have no time to do so. Without sufficient research and analysis, the commission's findings are unhelpful.
Inviting business operators and social groups to a public hearing wasn't a constructive approach. No one should comment on this issue without any prior research. This principle may not apply to social groups that have no authority and little resources, but the commission is the government authority and enjoys greater manpower and resources. Thus, even if the public does not call for an evaluation, the commission should do so for the sake of political accountability.
Feng Chien-san is a professor in the journalism department at National Chengchi University.
Translated by Eddy Chang
Speaking at the Copenhagen Democracy Summit on May 13, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that democracies must remain united and that “Taiwan’s security is essential to regional stability and to defending democratic values amid mounting authoritarianism.” Earlier that day, Tsai had met with a group of Danish parliamentarians led by Danish Parliament Speaker Pia Kjaersgaard, who has visited Taiwan many times, most recently in November last year, when she met with President William Lai (賴清德) at the Presidential Office. Kjaersgaard had told Lai: “I can assure you that ... you can count on us. You can count on our support
Denmark has consistently defended Greenland in light of US President Donald Trump’s interests and has provided unwavering support to Ukraine during its war with Russia. Denmark can be proud of its clear support for peoples’ democratic right to determine their own future. However, this democratic ideal completely falls apart when it comes to Taiwan — and it raises important questions about Denmark’s commitment to supporting democracies. Taiwan lives under daily military threats from China, which seeks to take over Taiwan, by force if necessary — an annexation that only a very small minority in Taiwan supports. Denmark has given China a
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
RSS