Is France about to exchange the fake revolution of May 1968 for a sham counter-revolution this year, or have the French given president-elect Nicolas Sarkozy a mandate for real change to modernize their country? Why did Sarkozy win the election and what are the likely consequences of his victory for France, Europe, and the world?
Above all, Sarkozy won because, while some who voted for him may have feared that he was "too much" in terms of personality, many more believed that presidential candidate Segolene Royal was simply "too little" in terms of gravitas -- an impression more confirmed than dissipated by their one face-to-face debate. Royal's failure, despite her energy and determination, came not because she is a woman, but in spite of it.
In 1968, after 10 years of former French president Charles de Gaulle, and in the midst of a period of strong growth and full employment, the French were bored. Today, after 12 years of President Jacques Chirac and 14 years of former president Francois Mitterrand, with a growth rate lower than most of Europe and a level of debt and unemployment higher than most, France is worried about decline and ripe for reform.
What Sarkozy understood better than anyone is that, 39 years after May 1968, France is in the mood for work, not love.
Most voters who backed Sarkozy expect a different sort of state, one that is more capable of providing physical security against violence and less capable of complicating their lives in economic and fiscal terms. This France endorses Sarkozy with enthusiasm while others view him as the unpleasant but necessary medicine France needs to cure its malaise.
Royal's last-minute warnings that France would explode as a result of Sarkozy's election were neither serious nor dignified. Yet France is a deeply divided and difficult to reform.
It is not Great Britain in the 1970s, a country that truly had nothing to lose by taking Margaret Thatcher's harsh road of structural change. From their unique lifestyle to their still-efficient public services, the French know that their country is not performing so badly. But, with a mixture of moroseness and voluntary submission, they now know that they must face their limitations.
Sarkozy has less than six months to implement the key reforms necessary if France wants to catch up with Europe's growth leaders. For that to happen, he needs a parliamentary majority, which he should get in the upcoming legislative elections.
But most of all, Sarkozy needs the French to be coherent about themselves. To achieve this, he must rally the positive energies that brought him to power, without inflaming the negative energies that will gather to resist change.
Indeed, this will be Sarkozy's main challenge. He demonstrated his pedagogic talents during the campaign. But firmness must be accompanied by a strong sense of respect for all those, particularly in the immigrant community, who did not vote for him. To win, he exploited the fears of a large part of the electorate; to succeed, he must instill hope.
For Europe, Sarkozy's election is not a bad omen. While the EU's problems will not be resolved because France has a new president, Sarkozy's vision of a simplified constitutional treaty to replace the draft that French and Dutch voters rejected in 2005 is more realistic than Royal's call for a new referendum.
A few years ago, Sarkozy alluded to a Club of Six to guide Europe. But Poland has excluded itself from the countries that matter politically and leaders in Italy and Spain openly campaigned for Royal. Euro-skeptic Gordon Brown is about to replace Prime Minister Tony Blair in Britain. So the Franco-German alliance will resume a leading role, if only by default.
Of course, Sarkozy and German Chancellor Angela Merkel will not reproduce the special alliances of former chancellor Helmut Schmidt and former French president Valery Giscard d'Estaing, or Mitterrand and former German chancellor Helmut Kohl. But the future of Europe will once more depend largely on the governments in Berlin and Paris.
That said, Sarkozy's victory will not make a huge difference for the world beyond Europe. While Chirac took a keen interest in world affairs, Sarkozy, by both inclination and political calculus, will concentrate, at least initially -- and in the absence of a major international crisis -- on internal matters. Even in transatlantic relations, change will be more a matter of style than content.
Yet Sarkozy's international influence has already been felt in the case of Turkey. The combination of his clear opposition to Turkey's admission to the EU and uncertainty about the ultimate agenda of the Islamist party in power there has contributed, at least in part, to the current Turkish crisis. Why should the opposing forces in Turkey behave with restraint if the moderating prospect of EU membership no longer exists?
France has a unique opportunity to adjust itself to the necessity of reform. The French have demonstrated maturity. But Sarkozy will have to act responsibly in proving that he really can change the country and reconcile the French with themselves and with France's position in a globalized world.
Dominique Moisi, a founder and Senior Advisor at the French Institute for International Relations, is currently a professor at the College of Europe in Natolin, Warsaw. Copyright: Project Syndicate
A series of strong earthquakes in Hualien County not only caused severe damage in Taiwan, but also revealed that China’s power has permeated everywhere. A Taiwanese woman posted on the Internet that she found clips of the earthquake — which were recorded by the security camera in her home — on the Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu. It is spine-chilling that the problem might be because the security camera was manufactured in China. China has widely collected information, infringed upon public privacy and raised information security threats through various social media platforms, as well as telecommunication and security equipment. Several former TikTok employees revealed
For the incoming Administration of President-elect William Lai (賴清德), successfully deterring a Chinese Communist Party (CCP) attack or invasion of democratic Taiwan over his four-year term would be a clear victory. But it could also be a curse, because during those four years the CCP’s People’s Liberation Army (PLA) will grow far stronger. As such, increased vigilance in Washington and Taipei will be needed to ensure that already multiplying CCP threat trends don’t overwhelm Taiwan, the United States, and their democratic allies. One CCP attempt to overwhelm was announced on April 19, 2024, namely that the PLA had erred in combining major missions
The Constitutional Court on Tuesday last week held a debate over the constitutionality of the death penalty. The issue of the retention or abolition of the death penalty often involves the conceptual aspects of social values and even religious philosophies. As it is written in The Federalist Papers by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison and John Jay, the government’s policy is often a choice between the lesser of two evils or the greater of two goods, and it is impossible to be perfect. Today’s controversy over the retention or abolition of the death penalty can be viewed in the same way. UNACCEPTABLE Viewing the
At the same time as more than 30 military aircraft were detected near Taiwan — one of the highest daily incursions this year — with some flying as close as 37 nautical miles (69kms) from the northern city of Keelung, China announced a limited and selected relaxation of restrictions on Taiwanese agricultural exports and tourism, upon receiving a Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) delegation led by KMT legislative caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅崑萁). This demonstrates the two-faced gimmick of China’s “united front” strategy. Despite the strongest earthquake to hit the nation in 25 years striking Hualien on April 3, which caused