On the eve of World Press Freedom Day on May 3, the US-based Freedom House released its annual survey of media freedom around the world. The report -- Freedom of the Press 2007 -- said that Taiwan enjoys the freest media environment in East Asia because of its firm support for an independent judiciary and economic freedom, as well as the government's respect for the freedom of speech as protected in the Constitution.
The survey showed that even though press freedom around the world as a whole declined last year, Taiwan wasn't affected by the trend. Indeed, Taiwan moved up from its 35th ranking last year to 33rd this year, joining other countries such as Finland, Germany and the US in the "free press" category. In Asia, Taiwan overtook Japan as the nation with the freest press.
As in the past, this news was barely covered by the local media. One reason may be that people often take freedom and democracy for granted. Some of this neglect also stems from ideological bias in the local media.
Distorted concepts of national identity often lead the media to portray Taiwan in decline and China on the rise. But the Chinese media are not free, as the Freedom House report says, and not even the best makeover would be able to cover up this fact. The report ranked China 181st in the world, saying Chinese officials had stepped up efforts to persecute the media and reporters over the past year.
Taiwanese media freedom has become a widely accepted fact. The more important question is what benefits or drawbacks free media can bring to the world of journalism and local society. The media's basic function is to provide accurate and balanced information to enable the public to make rational decisions. As such, independent and responsible media organizations are vital to democratic societies.
The truth, however, is that local media is biased.
There is a never-ending stream of erroneous reports, with no mechanism in place to fix these errors. And with media interference in politics growing every day, ideological and political persuasion often influences reporting.
News is being fabricated, and even opinion polls, which are supposed to faithfully reflect public opinion, often deviate from the truth. Talk shows deviate from rational debate, devolving into battlegrounds for factional fighting.
Not only does this kind of situation fail to strengthen democracy and promote public welfare, but it is also harmful to the news world itself.
Reporters are no longer respected, and many journalism professors are ashamed to reveal their identities.
The only work that seems to interest talented young people is being an anchor. What's more, an international survey last year showed that local media had a trust rating of only 1 percent.
The lifting of reporting restrictions in 1988 was a critical turning point in opening up the local media. However, 20 years of liberalization have only succeeded in turning the local media from a meek poodle under an authoritarian regime into a mad dog of the democratic era, as the Los Angeles Times once described media.
This kind of transformation has made it difficult for media workers to get more respect and honor. Taiwanese media -- the freest in Asia -- are in need of self-reflection.
But if the media meet the challenge, they can establish new milestones on the road to developing press freedom and a healthy democracy.
Lu Shih-hsiang is the chief executive officer of the Foundation for the Advancement of Media Excellence.
Translated by Marc Langer
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US