There was no political motivation when the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee said "no" to China's planned route for the Olympic torch. And Taiwanese should continue to say "no" to any attempts to belittle the nation's sovereignty.
Based on China's plan, the Olympic torch would pass by Taiwan twice -- on its way to Japan and to Vietnam -- but Beijing chose not to make any of these stops.
Taiwan had been trying to negotiate with China over the torch's route for years to no avail. Now some, notably China supporters in Taiwan, call Taiwan's rejection a political move. In other places, Taiwanese were called "Taiwan Nationalists" and equated to Chinese nationalism, German nationalism and Zionism.
Why do Taiwanese always get blamed for trying to be free, from being victimized by expansionists from Japan, China and the US? The movement to wipe out Taiwanese culture and language started in 1947, exactly 60 years ago. Sixty years may be too long, but it was not too long ago that Chinese started their massacre in Tibet. Both of these atrocities were committed by the Chinese.
Taiwan has been victimized politically, culturally and intellectually because of its geographical location. Whichever way you look at it, it is the Chinese who have politicized the Olympic Games.
While the Tibetans have foreigners protesting on their behalf, who speaks for the Taiwanese? We, the Taiwanese, have every right to speak for ourselves, and should continue to say "no" to those who discriminate against us.
Rao Kok-sian
Winchester, Massachusetts
Because much of what former US president Donald Trump says is unhinged and histrionic, it is tempting to dismiss all of it as bunk. Yet the potential future president has a populist knack for sounding alarums that resonate with the zeitgeist — for example, with growing anxiety about World War III and nuclear Armageddon. “We’re a failing nation,” Trump ranted during his US presidential debate against US Vice President Kamala Harris in one particularly meandering answer (the one that also recycled urban myths about immigrants eating cats). “And what, what’s going on here, you’re going to end up in World War
Earlier this month in Newsweek, President William Lai (賴清德) challenged the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to retake the territories lost to Russia in the 19th century rather than invade Taiwan. He stated: “If it is for the sake of territorial integrity, why doesn’t [the PRC] take back the lands occupied by Russia that were signed over in the treaty of Aigun?” This was a brilliant political move to finally state openly what many Chinese in both China and Taiwan have long been thinking about the lost territories in the Russian far east: The Russian far east should be “theirs.” Granted, Lai issued
On Tuesday, President William Lai (賴清德) met with a delegation from the Hoover Institution, a think tank based at Stanford University in California, to discuss strengthening US-Taiwan relations and enhancing peace and stability in the region. The delegation was led by James Ellis Jr, co-chair of the institution’s Taiwan in the Indo-Pacific Region project and former commander of the US Strategic Command. It also included former Australian minister for foreign affairs Marise Payne, influential US academics and other former policymakers. Think tank diplomacy is an important component of Taiwan’s efforts to maintain high-level dialogue with other nations with which it does
On Sept. 2, Elbridge Colby, former deputy assistant secretary of defense for strategy and force development, wrote an article for the Wall Street Journal called “The US and Taiwan Must Change Course” that defends his position that the US and Taiwan are not doing enough to deter the People’s Republic of China (PRC) from taking Taiwan. Colby is correct, of course: the US and Taiwan need to do a lot more or the PRC will invade Taiwan like Russia did against Ukraine. The US and Taiwan have failed to prepare properly to deter war. The blame must fall on politicians and policymakers