Some people have praised China's recent passage of a property rights law. They believe it is a key step in China's move toward market economics, and even a sign of the imminent end of China's "socialism." But if one steps outside the framework of economic law to look at things objectively, there are three serious issues to consider.
First, those who are ethusiastic about the law mistakenly believe that economic growth is the only facet of China's development and that perfecting market economics represents progress.
Structural issues concerning the economic system are not the only obstacles to building a market economy. Without an independent legal system loyal to the rule of law, without an informed and independent public opinion free from government control, and without a progressive spirit and culture, market economics are just deformed capitalism. China's economic development is, for the most part, precisely this. This model cannot be corrected by passing a law.
Second, China's problem isn't that it doesn't have laws. The problem is that it doesn't enforce them, making its laws worth little more than the paper they are written on. Since it first inked its Constitution, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has never enforced either the principles outlined in the Constitution or the country's laws. To these officials, laws are a propaganda tool serving the government. They cite laws when it suits them and tear the laws to shreds at other times.
Third, some people worry the law will be used to legalize various corrupt practices that are already widespread. State-owned assets will be swallowed, city residents will be forced to move, farmers' lands will be seized, monopolistic enterprises will exploit high prices and bank shares will be sold below value.
These concerns are connected to the most urgent problem facing China today -- political reform. Without protection from government laws, the property rights law could very easily end up as a tool for corrupt powers to legalize their corruption.
The property rights law and talk of a harmonious society are all well and good, but they are little more than empty words. Until China pursues systematic and sincere politicial reform, empty lip service won't be much to get excited about.
Wang Dan is a member of the Chinese democracy movement and a visiting scholar at Harvard University.
Translated by Marc Langer
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
Every day since Oct. 7 last year, the world has watched an unprecedented wave of violence rain down on Israel and the occupied Palestinian Territories — more than 200 days of constant suffering and death in Gaza with just a seven-day pause. Many of us in the American expatriate community in Taiwan have been watching this tragedy unfold in horror. We know we are implicated with every US-made “dumb” bomb dropped on a civilian target and by the diplomatic cover our government gives to the Israeli government, which has only gotten more extreme with such impunity. Meantime, multicultural coalitions of US