With the 2008 Beijing Olympics fast approaching, speculation abounds about the potential impact of the games on cross-strait relations.
It goes without saying that a successful, incident-free Olympics in Beijing is a top priority for the Chinese government. However, it would be naive to assume that Beijing would even consider adjusting its policy toward Taiwan -- even temporarily -- to improve its image ahead of the games.
It is no secret that the Chinese government sees the 2008 Olympics as an opportunity to promote itself as a modern, sophisticated and international China, and one of the most influential countries in the world in terms of political clout.
The amount of resources and the level of mobilization seen in preparation for the games demonstrates China's determination to make this event a huge success.
In light of this, some political analysts have suggested that the period immediately preceding the 2008 Olympics would be ideal timing for Taiwan to declare de jure independence.
They argue that Beijing would not dare to invade Taiwan then because such an act would incur the anger of the international community and jeopardize the success of their dream of wooing the world in Beijing next year. It would seem this thought has crossed others' minds as well. US Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice last week cautioned Taiwan not to take advantage of the Beijing Olympics to declare formal independence.
There is probably some truth to their theory. Until the Olympics are finished, Beijing would probably think twice before attacking Taiwan. It is understandable that political commentators believe Beijing would not be able to confront Taiwan's declaration of de jure independence. This probably also explains why no major disagreements have erupted between Taiwan and China over sensitive issues such as the route for the relay of the Olympic torch. No doubt many would have expected China to use this opportunity to emphasize its claim over Taiwan. On the contrary, a tactful consensus has reportedly been reached and what might have been a drawn-out issue with an aggressive undertone was resolved amicably.
Regardless, the idea that China would turn a blind eye to de jure independence is too optimistic. That Taiwan should be a province of China is just as important to China as wooing the international community. Moreover, Taiwan is important to China for the very same reason that the Olympics are important to it -- nationalism, a vivid image of a Great China in days gone by. For most of the 20th century, the Chinese have been tormented and enraged by the idea that China lost its former glory after the end of the imperial era.
China's victim mentality is so strong that to this day -- over half a century after the end of World War II -- the episode of Japan's invasion of China remains a blistering sore that constantly affects Sino-Japanese relations. The 2008 Olympics and Taiwan are important to China because both are part of Beijing's ultimate goal of recovering China's lost glory.
Thinking that China would prioritize the success of the Olympics over preventing Taiwan's de jure independence comes from a lack of understanding of China's motivation.
Two sets of economic data released last week by the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) have drawn mixed reactions from the public: One on the nation’s economic performance in the first quarter of the year and the other on Taiwan’s household wealth distribution in 2021. GDP growth for the first quarter was faster than expected, at 6.51 percent year-on-year, an acceleration from the previous quarter’s 4.93 percent and higher than the agency’s February estimate of 5.92 percent. It was also the highest growth since the second quarter of 2021, when the economy expanded 8.07 percent, DGBAS data showed. The growth
In the intricate ballet of geopolitics, names signify more than mere identification: They embody history, culture and sovereignty. The recent decision by China to refer to Arunachal Pradesh as “Tsang Nan” or South Tibet, and to rename Tibet as “Xizang,” is a strategic move that extends beyond cartography into the realm of diplomatic signaling. This op-ed explores the implications of these actions and India’s potential response. Names are potent symbols in international relations, encapsulating the essence of a nation’s stance on territorial disputes. China’s choice to rename regions within Indian territory is not merely a linguistic exercise, but a symbolic assertion
More than seven months into the armed conflict in Gaza, the International Court of Justice ordered Israel to take “immediate and effective measures” to protect Palestinians in Gaza from the risk of genocide following a case brought by South Africa regarding Israel’s breaches of the 1948 Genocide Convention. The international community, including Amnesty International, called for an immediate ceasefire by all parties to prevent further loss of civilian lives and to ensure access to life-saving aid. Several protests have been organized around the world, including at the University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) and many other universities in the US.
In the 2022 book Danger Zone: The Coming Conflict with China, academics Hal Brands and Michael Beckley warned, against conventional wisdom, that it was not a rising China that the US and its allies had to fear, but a declining China. This is because “peaking powers” — nations at the peak of their relative power and staring over the precipice of decline — are particularly dangerous, as they might believe they only have a narrow window of opportunity to grab what they can before decline sets in, they said. The tailwinds that propelled China’s spectacular economic rise over the past