As a graduate student in the US, I noticed something interesting about students there -- almost all my US classmates actively participated in class discussion, while most Asian students tended to be silent or, at best, reluctant to speak up in class.
One reason why US students eagerly shared their opinions in class might be due to the heavy weighting of participation in course grading. Moreover, my US classmates had been trained, since the very beginning of their school life, to speak their mind in public.
In Taiwan, students at the secondary level might not be encouraged to speak up in class owing to the pressures of entrance examinations, the way teacher deal with pupils' mistakes and mockery from peers.
One could expect, however, things to be different at the tertiary level, or with adult students in general, whom we could expect to be more active in class. Sadly, this doesn't seem to be the case either.
A survey conducted with four English teachers who were teaching classes of varying levels of proficiency and age showed that the teachers, not the students, did most of the talking -- even when the teachers pushed for conversation practice in class.
The reasons why Taiwanese students of all ages remain silent are worth exploring.
Insecurity in one's language abilities seems to play a large role. Many students have low confidence in their speaking abilities, more so when they are expected to speak extemporarily, without preparation. Students are afraid they will say something wrong and thereby embarrass themselves.
Unlike my US classmates, in their formative years most Taiwanese students were not trained to express their opinions on a variety of subjects, even less so in a foreign language. In fact, most of their experiences consisted of listening to the teacher.
Culture could also be a factor. Many students believe it is disrespectful to talk too much in class or to ask too many questions, fearing that doing so would take up too much of the teacher's -- and classmates' -- valuable time.
Many students also suffer from speaking anxiety. In other words, when they speak English, they become very self-conscious. This results in a sense of uneasiness and apprehension that they will not perform well enough.
A Hong Kong-based study of university-level student participation in class discussions showed that the majority of students preferred classes where they did most of the talking. The Hong Kong study and my own observations showed that college teachers need to explore a variety of strategies to encourage adult students to take a more active role in English classes. These include encouraging students to move away from traditional attitudes that reinforce passivity and silence, and creating a more relaxing and supportive environment for student participation through group work and other activities.
As far as English learning is concerned, students participation makes a marked difference. Participation improves language abilities both quantitatively and qualitatively. Group work is an effective method to generate student participation as well as linguistic interaction. If half of the class time is spent doing group work, a student's practice time will be five-fold that of the traditional method. Group work also enhances the quality of interactive English. In a traditional English classroom, language use is often limited to a fixed and artificial situation determined by the teacher. Group work, on the other hand, provides students with more face-to-face exchanges by using authentic, everyday language.
By understanding the reasons why Taiwanese students learning English are reluctant to express their ideas in the classroom, teachers can explore and develop strategies that will encourage students to speak up.
Kao Shih-fan is an assistant professor at Jin Wen Institute of Technology in Taipei.
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
In 1935, the German Reich led by the National Socialist Party officially created the Nuremberg Race Laws, a “legal cage”, for German Jews, stripping them of citizenship, criminalizing their personal relationships, barring them from public life, and transforming them into stateless subjects and isolating them from the rest of society. Similarly, in March 2026, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) National People’s Congress adopted the “Promoting Ethnic Unity and Progress” law, which represents the most significant shift in Chinese domestic governance since the era of Mao Zedong (毛澤東). Ostensibly designed as domestic legislation to manage China’s 56 officially recognized ethnic groups,
RSS